November 22, 2017

Colorado’s First Judicial District

Thank you for visiting. Colorado’s First Judicial District — comprising the counties of Jefferson and Gilpin — is a cesspool of corruption.

Under the leadership of former chief judge R. BROOKE JACKSON, who is now a federal judge, the next chief judge STEPHEN M. MUNSINGER, who was the divorce judge who ruined my family in 2006, and current chief judge PHILIP JAMES MCNULTY, who is presently orchestrating the “case fixing crime spree” against my family, tens-of-thousands of cases have been “fixed” for extra profits and federal funding.

Thousands of noncustodial parents have had their parenting time purposely lowered to jack up their child support orders, and then are blocked from modifying their child support orders even if they’ve lost their jobs. Thousands of criminal defendants have been over-charged, over-fined, over-sentenced, over-incarcerated, over-‘treated’, over-paroled, and otherwise ripped off in the criminal justice system.

Tens-of-millions of dollars have been extorted from unsuspecting Coloradans and tens-of-millions of dollars have been stolen from American taxpayers.


My name is John Mark Hentges and I am the founder of Pro Se Alliance. My five children and I are victims of one of the most egregious injustices in the history of the United States, which started in Colorado and then followed me to Minnesota where I have been exiled since 2007. As I now know, some of the highest authorities in both states are involved and are the driving force in the rampant “case fixing,” racketeering, money laundering, and other treasonous crimes.

As a result of the crime spree against my family, my kids and I have have been separated from each other for over 10 years and have been cutoff from all communications with each other for over 9 years. For a summary of my family’s ordeal, read the Introduction and Statement of the Case sections of our “Master Civil Complaint.”

Because none of the defendants answered our master complaint, there will be numerous subsequent lawsuits seeking jury awards for a portion of the record-setting overall damages. Our first subsequent lawsuit – against my ex-wife and Jefferson County Child Support Services for their frauds upon the courts and other crimes in Minnesota – can be read here. Scroll down for “Excerpts from My Criminal Complaint” against Jefferson County Department of Human Services Director LYNN A. JOHNSON and her team of racketeers.

I am seeking information regarding the government’s abuse of my family over the past 13 years, both in Colorado and in Minnesota. If you have any information regarding the crimes against my family in either state, or if you are a victim of injustice in Colorado’s First Judicial District, please go here and fill out the form at the bottom of the page. Thank you.

Generous REWARDS will be paid from jury awards
for ANY information used in my family’s lawsuits.


To expose the corruption in Colorado, we are launching an investigation in Colorado’s First Judicial District, and seek information, eye-witness accounts, and even hearsay accounts (what you’ve heard from others) from the People of Jefferson and Gilpin counties to start.

If you or a loved one have ever been denied modification of child support, denied counsel in a criminal matter, held in jail without bail, falsely accused by CPS, or otherwise abused “under color of” family law, probate law, or the criminal justice system, or have been victimized by any of the following “case fixing criminals” in Jefferson County, please email us at contact@prosealliance.org.

Chief Judge PHILIP JAMES MCNULTY
Judge CHRISTOPHER CLAYTON ZENISEK
Magistrate JAMIN M. ALABISO
County Attorney MARGARET A. DAVIS

We also seek volunteers! So please also email us if you can help with the investigation in any way, or discovery, service of process, drafting court documents, filing, mailing, or any other function as we bring the “case fixers” to justice.


EXCERPTS FROM MY CRIMINAL COMPLAINT v. JEFFCO-DHS:
[Alleging probable cause of the crimes committed against my family during the “child support scam” by Jeffco-DHS officials; the “case fixing crime spree” by officers of the Colorado First Judicial District Courts will be posted below.]

Regarding JANE’s crimes during her divorce:

During her wrongful divorce in Jefferson County Colorado (case 2005DR212), my ex-wife JANE DOE committed hundreds of acts of child abuse against our five living children (in violation of C.R.S. §§ 18-6-401, 18-6-701, 18-3-304), hundreds of acts of domestic violence against me (in violation of C.R.S. § 18-6-800.3), thefts (in violation of C.R.S. §§ 18-4-401, 18-4-409, 18-4-410), frauds (in violation of C.R.S. §§ 26-1-127, 18-5-102, 18-8-111, 18-8-502), and many other crimes.

Because “Parental Alienation” harms a child’s health, it is child abuse under C.R.S. § 18-6-401(1)(a). Because child abuse is always a crime, PA is a crime. Because JANE acted knowingly or recklessly in each act of child abuse to alienate me from our kids, each act is a class 1 misdemeanor pursuant to C.R.S. § 18-6-401(7)(a)(V), or a class 5 felony under C.R.S. § 18-3-304 and C.R.S. § 18-3-303, or a class 4 felony under C.R.S. § 18-6-701 and C.R.S. § 18-6-102; and because each of JANE’s child abuses was ‘used as a method of coercion, control, punishment, intimidation, or revenge’ against me during and after her divorce, each is an act of domestic violence against me pursuant to C.R.S. § 18-6-800.3.

To date, I have documented over 300 specific acts of child abuse by JANE and over 300 specific crimes against me; and therefore, in addition, JANE has committed over 600 specific acts of domestic violence against me.

Regarding crimes to “fix” JANE’s divorce against me:

JANE, her sisters, two friends, her attorney, the “Child and Family Investigator,” and others, committed multiple frauds and frauds upon the court to influence Temporary and Permanent Orders in divorce case 2005DR212. During and immediately after JANE’s divorce, the original “case fixing criminals”1 knew all about the frauds upon their courts and committed their own frauds upon the public record and other crimes (see separate Criminal Complaints) to “fix” the divorce against me in all regards. More recently, starting in the fall of 2015 when I filed my motion to modify parental responsibilities and continuing to this day, the present “case fixing criminals” have committed their own frauds upon the public record and other crimes (see herein and in separate Criminal Complaints) to “fix” the child support matters and other matters against me in all regards.

Regarding crimes during the post-divorce “crime spree” and “child support scam”:

I, the undersigned victim/complainant/affiant, state under penalty of perjury that the following is true and correct:

In May 2006, JANE, her attorney—JOHN CHARLES HUGGER, and the “intervenor”2 in 05DR212 (“Jeffco-CSS”) began a “crime spree” against my family, and a “child support scam”3 against the People of Jefferson County, the People of Colorado, and the People of the united States of America, both of which continue to this day and including but are not limited to: frauds (in violation of C.R.S. §§ 26-1-127, 18-5-102, 18-5-114, 18-8-114, 18-8-406, 18-8-502, fraud upon the court, & 18 U.S.C §§ 1341, 1346, etc.), theft (in violation of C.R.S. § 18-4-401), theft of public funds (in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 666), making and processing fictitious obligations (in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 514), identity theft (in violation of C.R.S. § 18-5-902), criminal extortion (in violation of C.R.S. § 18-3-207), racketeering (in violation of C.R.S. §§ 18-17-101 to 18-17-109), treason (in violation of C.R.S. § 18-11-101 & 18 U.S.C. § 2381), and many other “treasonous” crimes; as follows:

1     I call those who destroyed my family over a decade ago, and those who have knowingly continued the crime spree against my family to this day, what they are: “criminals” and “traitors.” I mean no disrespect to any GOOD judges and attorneys in Colorado (who are not involved in the treasonous crimes taking place in this state), or to any other GOOD officials and professionals, who should come together, now, to oust these evil people from our courts and our government offices. The original “case fixing criminals” are: divorce judge STEPHEN M. MUNSINGER, then chief judge R. BROOK JACKSON, magistrate CHRIS VOISINET, and magistrate BABETTE NORTON. The present “case fixing criminals” are: magistrate JAMIN M ALABISO, judge CHRISTOPHER CLAYTON ZENISEK, and chief judge PHILIP JAMES MCNULTY.

2     JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES and its child support enforcement office—Jefferson County Child Support Services (“Jeffco-CSS”) and child protection office—Jefferson County Child Protective Services (“Jeffco-CPS”); as represented by the JEFFERSON COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE.

3     To obtain federal funding, states must waive their Eleventh Amendment immunity, and therefore their county and state employees—including human service workers, judges, attorneys, and others who perform government functions related to child support under Title IV-D, child protection under Title IV-E, or other federally-funded services—act as “agents” for the federal government. And when county and state employees engage in criminal misconduct while acting as agents for the federal government they are usually guilty of both state and federal crimes.

COUNTS 1-10

I am informed and believe that the intervenor’s officials and co-conspirators—including the intervenor’s lawyers at the Jefferson County Attorney’s Office, the original and present “case fixing criminals,” and all others involved in the “child support scam”—do not have valid oaths of office on file and are not bonded as required by Colorado’s constitution and general laws (and have been officiating as such for many years), and are therefore guilty of ‘impersonating public servants’ in violation of C.R.S. § 18-8-113.

COUNTS 11-54

In May 2006, JANE and HUGGER, and at least two Jeffco-CSS officials—Jeffco-CSS manager/Title IV-D Administrator DEBBIE MOSS and Caseworker LISA MCGUIRE—started the post-divorce “crime spree” against my family and “child support scam” against the People when JANE fraudulently applied to Jeffco-CSS for Title IV-D child support enforcement services and public assistance, and Jeffco-CSS’s MOSS and MCGUIRE opened Title IV-D case 30-289499-44-1A for JANE—all knowing that she is ineligible—JANE and HUGGER committing the state crime of ‘attempt to influence a public servant by means of deceit’ with the intent to obtain services and public assistance to which JANE is not entitled, in violation of C.R.S. § 18-8-306, and state and federal perjuries under C.R.S. § 18-8-502 and 18 U.S.C. § 1621 respectively and/or subornation of perjury under 18 U.S.C. § 1622; JANE, HUGGER, MOSS and MCGUIRE all committing state and federal conspiracies, including a conspiracy to facilitate JANE’s fraudulent application for Title IV-D services (C.R.S. § 18-2-201), conspiracy against my children’s and my rights to honest services (18 U.S.C. § 241), a conspiracy to defraud the government with respect to claims (18 U.S.C. § 286), a conspiracy to defraud the U.S. Dept. of Health & Human Services (18 U.S.C. § 371), and another count of conspiracy to cheat the Title IV-D system and ripoff the American taxpayers by obtaining funding for enforcement of the known fictitious child support order (18 U.S.C. § 371); and all committing several frauds, including ‘fraudulent acts’ by obtaining, or aiding JANE to obtain, benefits (child support enforcement services) and public assistance to which she is not entitled (C.R.S. § 26-1-127), making a ‘false, fictitious or fraudulent claim’ against public funds held in the Title IV-D system for ‘needy’ families in Jefferson County (18 U.S.C. § 287), and intending to defraud me by devising a scheme to force me to pay my child support obligations again (knowing that my child support obligations are paid-in-full) and using the mail service to carry out their fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1341 and/or 18 U.S.C. § 1346 (“Honest Services Fraud”)); HUGGER and MOSS committing ‘criminal solicitation’ (C.R.S. § 18-2-301) to induce JANE to participate in their treasonous crimes; and all four committing one or more counts of indirect child abuse against my 5 minor children at the time (C.R.S. § 18-6-401).

COUNTS 55-66

Jeffco-CSS’s MOSS and MCGUIRE conspired, processed (in the federally regulated and funded Title IV-D Program) and enforced (to this day with the full police power of the state) the known fictitious and void child support order, under color of law, each committing at least 3 state crimes—conspiracy (C.R.S. § 18-2-201), ‘first degree official misconduct’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-404), and one or more counts of indirect child abuse against my 5 minor children at the time (C.R.S. § 18-6-401); and each committing at least 3 federal crimes—a class B federal felony according to 18 U.S.C. § 514 – Fictitious obligations, conspiracy against my children’s and my rights according to 18 U.S.C. § 241, and deprivation of my children’s and my rights under color of law in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 242.

COUNTS 67-76

As I now know, to carry out their roles in Jeffco-CSS’s racketeering scheme and money laundering operation, which I believe is massive in size and scope, MOSS and MCGUIRE also committed state and federal conspiracies under C.R.S. § 18-2-201 and 18 U.S.C. § 241 respectively, to commit several state and federal crimes in the beginning of the case, including ‘gathering’ my social security number and other personal and financial information by deceit (C.R.S. § 18-5-904) for use in their racketeering scheme under the name of my “strawman”—“JOHN M. HENTGES”—the fictitious ‘person’ named as the ‘respondent’ in JANE’s divorce and named as the ‘obligor’ in the Title IV-D case; using my personal and financial information with the intent to obtain undue federal funding in the Title IV-D Program (C.R.S. § 18-5-902); in preparation for their mission to continually extort from me under color of law as though I was the ‘obligor’ by making threats to confine me, cause me economic hardship, and damage my reputation, with the intent to induce me to pay my child support again so JANE and Jeffco-CSS could profit (C.R.S. § 18-3-207). [And to otherwise racketeer, launder money, and engage in organized crime in violation of C.R.S. §§ 18-17-101 to 18-17-109, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1951 to 1960 CHAPTER 95-Racketeering, and 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961 to 1968 CHAPTER 96-Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations—see last entry below.]

COUNTS 77-86

Jeffco-CSS’s MOSS and MCGUIRE conspired and purposely failed to verify the facts in JANE’s fraudulent application for Title IV-D services as required by C.R.S. § 26-2-107, each committing state and federal conspiracies under C.R.S. § 18-2-201 and 18 U.S.C. § 241 respectively, each committing counts of ‘first degree official misconduct’ under C.R.S. § 18-8-404, each committing deprivations of my children’s and my rights under color of law according to 18 U.S.C. § 242, and each committing one or more counts of indirect child abuse against my 5 minor children at the time (C.R.S. § 18-6-401).

COUNTS 87-96

Jeffco-CSS’s MOSS and MCGUIRE found out from my letters in the summer of 2006 about JANE’s post-divorce denials of my contact and parenting time with our children, JANE’s hold on my tools and work equipment preventing me from working, JANE’s acts of domestic violence against me, and other elements of JANE’s continued crime spree, but failed to report their knowledge of the crimes and instead conspired to support JANE’s post-divorce crimes spree in any way they could, each committing 3 state crimes—conspiracy (C.R.S. § 18-2-201), another count of ‘first degree official misconduct’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-404), and one or more counts of indirect child abuse against my 5 minor children at the time (C.R.S. § 18-6-401); and each committing 3 federal crimes—conspiracy against my children’s and my rights according to 18 U.S.C. § 241, and ‘misprision of felony’ under 18 U.S.C. § 4.

COUNTS 97-99

On June 9 2006, HUGGER sent a fraudulent letter to my attorney in an attempt to extort $6,301.50 from me—the amount obtained by fraud upon the court for ‘back-maintenance’, which HUGGER knows I do not owe, committing a ‘criminal attempt’ (C.R.S. § 18-2-101) to criminally extort (C.R.S. § 18-3-207) more money from me, and another count of indirect child abuse against my 5 minor children at the time (C.R.S. § 18-6-401).

COUNTS 100-113

On June 21, 2006, Jeffco-CSS’s MOSS and MCGUIRE conspired, created (in the federally regulated and funded Title IV-D Program) and enforced (to this day with the full police power of the state) a known fictitious arrears balance, under color of law, each committing at least 4 state crimes—conspiracy (C.R.S. § 18-2-201), forgery (C.R.S. § 18-5-102), ‘first degree official misconduct’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-404), and one or more counts of indirect child abuse against my 5 minor children at the time (C.R.S. § 18-6-401); and each committing at least 3 federal crimes—a class B federal felony according to 18 U.S.C. § 514 – Fictitious obligations, conspiracy against my children’s and my rights according to 18 U.S.C. § 241, and deprivation of my children’s and my rights under color of law in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 242.

COUNTS 114-118

In the summer of 2006, MCGUIRE repeatedly refused to credit the Title IV-D account for my first two payments toward child support and added those amounts to the arrears balance, committing another count of forgery (C.R.S. § 18-5-102), an ‘abuse of public records’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-114), another count of ‘first degree official misconduct’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-404), another deprivation of my children’s and my rights under color of law (18 U.S.C. § 242), and another count of indirect child abuse against my 5 minor children at the time (C.R.S. § 18-6-401).

COUNTS 119-140

In the post-divorce, HUGGER and JANE conspired and continued to hold “my things,” including my ‘tools and work equipment’, my work vehicles, my office computer and equipment, my intellectual property for estimating and bidding jobs, and many other things needed for work, with the intent to permanently deprive me of my things, each committing conspiracy (C.R.S. § 18-2-201), theft (C.R.S. § 18-4-401), 8 counts of ‘aggravated motor vehicle theft’ (C.R.S. § 18-4-409), and one or more counts of indirect child abuse against my 5 minor children at the time (C.R.S. § 18-6-401).

COUNTS 141-155

In the fall of 2006, MCGUIRE repeatedly refused to acknowledge the facts that JANE was still holding my ‘tools and work equipment’, 8 vehicles and many other things in contempt of the divorce orders and that it was preventing me from bidding jobs and working, but despite MCGUIRE’s duties to report JANE’s blatant thefts (and her child abuses as a ‘mandatory reporter’) and to administratively find said facts in the Title IV-D case and “review and adjust” the child support accordingly, MCGUIRE committed state and federal conspiracies (C.R.S. § 18-2-201 & 18 U.S.C. § 241) with JANE and HUGGER (and likely others in her office), to aid JANE in the continuance of her state and federal crimes (C.R.S. § 18-2-101 & 18 U.S.C. § 2), to prevent discovery and prosecution of JANE’s state and federal crimes (C.R.S. § 18-8-105 & 18 U.S.C. § 3), to otherwise maliciously cause harm to me (another count of ‘first degree official misconduct’ under C.R.S. § 18-8-404) and deprive me of my rights in the Title IV-D child support enforcement racket (18 U.S.C. § 242), and one or more counts of indirect child abuse against my 5 minor children at the time (C.R.S. § 18-6-401).

COUNTS 156-164

At this time, MCGUIRE also committed another act of ‘first degree official misconduct’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-404), another “honest service fraud” (18 U.S.C. § 1346) and mail fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1341) to cause the suspension of my driver’s license without due process (18 U.S.C. § 242), another act of ‘first degree official misconduct’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-404) to cause the ruination of my credit, another act of ‘first degree official misconduct’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-404) to cause the levies of my bank accounts and my children’s trust account, and 3 more counts of indirect child abuse against my 5 minor children (C.R.S. § 18-6-401).

COUNTS 165-178

At this time, MCGUIRE also conspired (C.R.S. § 18-2-201) with JANE and HUGGER (and likely others in her office) and caused the thefts (2 counts each of C.R.S. § 18-4-401, or of criminal extortion (C.R.S. § 18-4-401)) of $701.65 from my accounts and $5,500.51 from my children’s trust account, and JANE knowingly received the stolen/extorted money (C.R.S. § 18-4-410 & 18 U.S.C. § 880), and therefore each also committed one or more counts of indirect child abuse against my 5 minor children at the time (C.R.S. § 18-6-401). [And since then over 20 officials (to be named in separate criminal complaints) have joined the state and federal conspiracies against my children’s and my rights (C.R.S. § 18-2-201 & 18 U.S.C. § 241), and have committed acts of ‘first degree official misconduct’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-404) to deprive my children and me of our rights to the return of our property under color of law (18 U.S.C. § 242).]

COUNTS 179-212

When I offered in a letter my share of the “MSE Settlement” money in lieu of child support, MCGUIRE refused to credit the account accordingly, committing another act of ‘first degree official misconduct’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-404) to deprive me of my rights under color of law in the Title IV-D program (18 U.S.C. § 242) and another count of indirect child abuse against my 5 minor children at the time (C.R.S. § 18-6-401); and when I had a speaker-phone conversation with MOSS and Supervisor JUDY NIGHTINGALE about this and about all the crimes committed against my family to this point, they committed state and federal conspiracies against my children’s and my rights (C.R.S. § 18-2-201 & 18 U.S.C. § 241); another count of ‘first degree official misconduct’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-404) and deprivation of rights under color of law (18 U.S.C. § 242) by refusing to credit the account accordingly; another count of ‘first degree official misconduct’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-404) and deprivation of rights under color of law (18 U.S.C. § 242) by refusing to correct the account in the amount of the back-maintenance; another count of ‘first degree official misconduct’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-404) and deprivation of rights under color of law (18 U.S.C. § 242) by refusing to restore the money stolen from me; another count of ‘first degree official misconduct’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-404) and deprivation of rights under color of law (18 U.S.C. § 242) by refusing to restore the money stolen from my children; and another count of ‘first degree official misconduct’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-404); another deprivation of rights under color of law (18 U.S.C. § 242), ‘duty to report’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-115), and ‘misprision of felony’ (18 U.S.C. § 4), by failing to report the crime sprees to the authorities and/or protect my children and me from further harm; and another 5 counts of indirect child abuse against my 5 minor children at the time (C.R.S. § 18-6-401).

COUNTS 213-242

On February 1 2007, I submitted a motion to modify child support in case 05DR212, but it was promptly denied along with 3 other motions, without any hearings, without any findings of fact or other adjudication, and without authority or jurisdiction which were lost during a previous crime spree, by magistrate CHRIS VOISINET—one of Colorado’s“case fixing criminals” who, unbeknownst to me at the time, was instrumental in “fixing” Permanent Orders against me (see separate criminal complaints)—committing 4 counts of ‘first degree official misconduct’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-404), 4 counts of deprivation of rights under color of law (18 U.S.C. § 242), and 4 counts of indirect child abuse against my 5 minor children at the time (C.R.S. § 18-6-401); state and federal conspiracies against my children’s and my rights (C.R.S. § 18-2-201 & 18 U.S.C. § 241) with his clerk, who held VOISINET’s orders until February 20th before mailing them to me to prevent an appeal, committing a count of indirect child abuse against my 5 minor children at the time (C.R.S. § 18-6-401); each also committing “honest service fraud” (18 U.S.C. § 1346) and mail fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1341); and state and federal conspiracies against my children’s and my rights (C.R.S. § 18-2-201 & 18 U.S.C. § 241) with then chief judge R. BROOKE JACKSON, who I reported the ongoing child abuse and crime spree to, and who therefore committed a count of indirect child abuse against my 5 minor children at the time (C.R.S. § 18-6-401), state and federal accessory after the fact crimes to prevent discovery and prosecution of VOISINET’s crimes (C.R.S. § 18-8-105 & 18 U.S.C. § 3), failure to report the child abuses and crimes (C.R.S. § 18-8-115), and ‘misprision of felony’ (18 U.S.C. § 242); all to keep the emerging “child support scam” going.

COUNTS 243-245

On March 29 2007, I applied at Jeffco-CSS for a “Review and Adjustment” of the child support, but NIGHTINGALE refused to initiate the process, committing another count of ‘first degree official misconduct’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-404), deprivation of rights under color of law (18 U.S.C. § 242), and indirect child abuse against my 5 minor children (C.R.S. § 18-6-401).

COUNTS 246-251

During this time frame, I began reporting Jeffco-CSS’s creation of the fictitious original arrears balance in the amount of the back-maintenance, the illegal enforcement of back-maintenance through the Title IV-D system, and other elements of Jeffco-CSS’s crime spree, to the intervenor’s director, LYNN JOHNSON, [& up the chain-of-command at the Colorado Department of Human Services (“CDHS”) and to the county’s and state’s highest-authorities], but JOHNSON intentionally failed to intervene, and therefore became a state and federal accessory (C.R.S. § 18-8-105 & 18 U.S.C. § 3) in the processing of the fictitious child support order and the creation of and processing of the fictitious arrears balance (two counts of 18 U.S.C. § 514), as well as an accessory in JANE’s ongoing child abuses (C.R.S. § 18-6-401) and crimes (e.g. domestic violence against me (C.R.S. § 18-6-800.3)), [and in hundreds of other state and federal crimes by the intervenor’s offices in their “child support scam.”]

COUNTS 252-260

In April 2007, JACKSON facilitated the theft of my share of the MSE money (C.R.S. § 18-4-401), JACKSON and VOISINET conspired (C.R.S. § 18-2-201) and orchestrated the extortion (C.R.S. § 18-3-207) of an additional $20,000.00 from me, and JANE knowingly and gladly received the stolen money (C.R.S. § 18-4-410); each therefore committing another indirect child abuse against my 5 minor children at the time (C.R.S. § 18-6-401). [All, as I now know, just a very small part of the enormous racketeering scheme and money laundering operation in Colorado’s First Judicial District in violation of C.R.S. §§ 18-17-101 to 18-17-109, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1951 to 1960 CHAPTER 95-Racketeering, and 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961 to 1968 CHAPTER 96-Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations—see last entry below.]

[To protect my five children and myself from further harm following my 4th false arrest and false imprisonment in Colorado, I moved to Minnesota on May 19 2007.]

COUNTS 261-270

Following my first request for a federally mandated “review and adjustment” process on March 29, 2007, NIGHTINGALE and MOSS conspired and refused to review and adjust the child support order and arrears balance, as required by state and federal Title IV-D regulations, each committing state and federal conspiracies against my children’s and my rights (C.R.S. § 18-2-201 & 18 U.S.C. § 241), another count of ‘first degree official misconduct’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-404), another count of deprivation of rights under color of law (18 U.S.C. § 242), and another indirect child abuse against my 5 minor children at the time (C.R.S. § 18-6-401).

COUNTS 271-278

When JANE and Jeffco-CSS1 found out where I was working in 2007, someone contacted the Nicollet County Sheriff’s Office in Minnesota, defrauded them, and caused them to visit my workplace, with the intent to have me falsely arrested or to cause me other injury—however, I was not there at the time—nonetheless, committing their first conspiracy in Minnesota (Minn. Stat. § 609.175), their first deceit resulting in official misconduct in Minnesota (Minn. Stat. § 609.43(3)), their first stalking crime in Minnesota (Minn. Stat. § 609.749), and another indirect child abuse against my 5 minor children at the time (C.R.S. § 18-6-401).

1     JANE and the various Colorado officials involved in the “child support scam” knew all along that my child support obligations are paid-in-full, that the child support order is void, that the arrears balance is zero, etc., and could have stepped forward at any time with the truth; but didn’t, and therefore are implicated in every crime committed in Minnesota.

COUNTS 279-309

When JANE and Jeffco-CSS found out where I was living, Jeffco-CSS caseworker JESSICA DELGADILLO contacted the Le Sueur County Child Support Services office (“LeSueur-CSS”) to register the known void Colorado child support order and known false arrears balance in Minnesota for enforcement in the now interstate child support case under the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (UIFSA), transmitted a fraudulent and perjured “Registration Statement,” and conspired with LeSueur-CSS caseworker TAMMY MORGAN to injure me under color of official authority, starting the “crime spree” in Minnesota that continues to this day; each committing state and federal conspiracies against my children’s and my rights (Minn. Stat. § 609.175 & 18 U.S.C. § 241), state and federal perjuries (Minn. Stat. § 609.48 & 18 U.S.C. § 1621), “honest service fraud” (18 U.S.C. § 1346), wire fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1343), official misconduct by public officers in Minnesota (Minn. Stat. § 609.43(3)), and an indirect child abuse against my 5 minor children at the time (C.R.S. § 18-6-401). [And their first conspiracies and crimes with Minnesota’s traitors in their ongoing racketeering scheme and money laundering operation here in Minnesota in violation of Minn. Stat. § 609.903 et. seq, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1951 to 1960 CHAPTER 95-Racketeering, and 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961 to 1968 CHAPTER 96-Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations—see last entry below.]

COUNTS 310-324

Following my second request for “review and adjustment” of the child support order and arrears balance through LeSueur-CSS in February 2008, the review was conducted in Jefferson County Colorado by Jeffco-CSS caseworker SHERRI FANNING, on information and belief in conspiracy with NIGHTINGALE and MOSS, later recommended a reduction in the monthly child support obligation from $1717.92 to the still fictitious amount of $521.00, each committing state and federal conspiracies against my children’s and my rights (C.R.S. § 18-2-201 & 18 U.S.C. § 241), a count of ‘first degree official misconduct’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-404), a count of processing known ‘fictitious obligations’ (18 U.S.C. § 514), and an indirect child abuse against my 5 minor children at the time (C.R.S. § 18-6-401).

COUNTS 325-364

In April 2008, JANE and DELGADILLO conspired and transmitted another known false arrears balance for registration to MORGAN—who was then conspiring and working with Le Sueur County Attorney BRENT CHRISTIAN and judge RICHARD C. PERKINS, the first two of Minnesota’s “case fixing criminals”—along with a copy of the known void child support order and 87 pages of prejudicial and irrelevant documents, with the intent to influence the registration process and local law enforcement and cause further official misconduct and color of law violations (“case fixing”) in Minnesota, each committing state and federal conspiracies against my children’s and my rights (Minn. Stat. § 609.175 & 18 U.S.C. § 241), state and federal perjuries (Minn. Stat. § 609.48 & 18 U.S.C. § 1621), “honest service fraud” (18 U.S.C. § 1346), wire fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1343), official misconduct by public officers in Minnesota (Minn. Stat. § 609.43(3)), and indirect child abuse against my 5 minor children at the time (C.R.S. § 18-6-401).

COUNTS 365-392

To obtain the object of the conspiracy during the summer of 2008—to register the two fictitious obligations in Minnesota—in addition to each committing state and federal conspiracies against my children’s and my rights (Minn. Stat. § 609.175 & 18 U.S.C. § 241) in the Minnesota registration proceeding (case 40-FA-07-1253) and one or more further counts of indirect child abuse against my 5 minor children at the time (C.R.S. § 18-6-401): JANE obstructed justice by ‘tampering with’ one of my witnesses prior to the August 18th hearing (18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2)) and committed state and federal perjuries in her answers to my discover requests (Minn. Stat. § 609.48 & 18 U.S.C. § 1621); DELGADILLO, NIGHTINGALE, and MOSS committed another count of “honest services fraud” (18 U.S.C. § 1346) by remaining silent about the blatant fraud upon the Minnesota court via DELGADILLO’s Registration Statement; MORGAN and CHRISTIAN committed counts of “honest services fraud” (18 U.S.C. § 1346) by remaining silent about not only their knowledge of DELGADILLO’s false Registration Statement but also about their knowledge that my child support obligations are paid-in-full and the child support order is void, and committed several of their own frauds upon the Minnesota court to process (register) the known fictitious child support order (one count each of 18 U.S.C. § 514) and known fictitious arrears balance (another count each of 18 U.S.C. § 514); and PERKINS also committed “honest services fraud” (18 U.S.C. § 1346) and 2 counts of this class B federal felony (18 U.S.C. § 514) when he fraudulently approved the registration by order in September 2008, even admitting in his order that it was [b]ased upon the testimony and exhibits,” which included JANE’s fraudulent answers to my discovery requests, “and the filings from Colorado,” which included Jeffco-CSS’s fraudulent Registration Statements and 87 pages of prejudicial and irrelevant documents. [PERKINS’ order essentially adopted Jeffco-CSS’s “child support scam” and stalking and oppression in Minnesota and has now led to the implication of over 100 other Minnesota officials in the “crime spree” against my family—to be alleged in separate criminal complaints].

COUNTS 393-416

When JANE objected to FANNING’s recommendation to reduce the monthly child support obligation from $1717.92 to $521.00, on July 7 2008 (see above), Jeffco-CSS’s attorney Casie Shorey (now CASIE STOKES) filed the appropriate motion to modify in VOISINET’s court; but on September 22, STOKES filed a fraudulent Motion to Withdraw Motion for Modification, stating, “Further review of the case leads the Department to determine that a recalculation of child support is not appropriate at this time. Application of the Colorado Child Support Guidelines results in less than a 10% change from the amount currently ordered”; VOISINET granted STOKES’ motion on September 29 before I could respond; VOISINET’s clerk held the order until October 10 before mailing it to me to prevent an appeal; and when I petitioned JACKSON for review, he denied it and ordered me to pay STOKES for her time to respond; and therefore all three (STOKES, VOISINET, and JACKSON) committing state and federal conspiracies against my children’s and my rights (C.R.S. § 18-2-201 & 18 U.S.C. § 241), acts of “honest service fraud” (18 U.S.C. § 1346) and mail fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1341), deprivations of rights under color of law (18 U.S.C. § 242), further processing of the fictitious child support order and arrears balance (2 counts each of 18 U.S.C. § 514), and one or more counts of indirect child abuse against my 5 minor children (C.R.S. § 18-6-401).

COUNTS 417-458

In January 2009, I formally objected—to JOHNSON, and copied JANE, Jefferson County Attorney ELLEN WAKEMAN, Jefferson County commissioners FAYE GRIFFEN, KEVIN MCCASKY, and KATHY HARTMAN, CDHS officials, and the highest-authorities in both Colorado and Minnesota—to the continued enforcement of the known void child support order, on the grounds that my children are not “needy” as defined by state and federal law and for other reasons, and demanded that Jeffco-CSS cease and desist and that the Title IV-D case be reconciled and closed, as required by law, but no one responded and instead, JOHNSON, WAKEMAN, GRIFFEN, MCCASKY, HARTMAN, MOSS [and likely others] obviously conspired to keep the Title IV-D case open and the “child support scam” going in both states and instructed their employees to continue with Jeffco-CSS’s racketeering in both states and thefts from American taxpayers, each committing state and federal conspiracies against my children’s and my rights (C.R.S. § 18-2-201 & 18 U.S.C. § 241), conspiracy to defraud the government’ (18 U.S.C. § 286), theft of public funds (18 U.S.C. § 666), counts of ‘first degree official misconduct’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-404), deprivations of rights under color of law (18 U.S.C. § 242), and one or more counts of indirect child abuse against my 5 minor children (C.R.S. § 18-6-401).

COUNTS 459-490

On March 3, 2009, I wrote to STOKES—and copied WAKEMAN, GRIFFEN, MCCASKY, and HARTMAN—to let her know that I was reporting her crimes; and I wrote a very detailed letter to WAKEMAN—and copied GRIFFEN, MCCASKY, and HARTMAN—in follow up to my formal objection and requested that she personally take whatever action necessary for her wayward officials to close and fully reconcile the child support matters, as required by law; but no one responded, the “child support scam” continued unabated, and it was around this time that WAKEMAN, JOHNSON, MOSS, and other Jefferson County leaders, instructed their offices to ignore my requests to reconcile the child support account, to stonewall my CORA requests for information, to ignore my complaints, and to blacklist me to prevent me from obtaining any services in Jefferson County; each therefore committing further state and federal conspiracies against my children’s and my rights (C.R.S. § 18-2-201 & 18 U.S.C. § 241), further counts of ‘first degree official misconduct’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-404), further deprivations of rights under color of law (18 U.S.C. § 242); counts of obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2)) against my children and me, as both victims and as witnesses; state and federal accessories to STOKE’s crimes (C.R.S. § 18-8-105 & 18 U.S.C. § 3), and one or more counts of indirect child abuse against my 5 minor children (C.R.S. § 18-6-401).

COUNTS 491-495

In June 2009, I again formally objected to JOHNSON [and other leaders in Colorado and Minnesota—to be named in separate criminal complaints], this time providing 18 “further reasons that Jeffco-CSS must cease and desist enforcement of the orders,” but JOHNSON again failed to do anything as required by law or to even respond [and all involved therefore continued to enforce the known fictitious and void Colorado child support order and false arrears balance in violation of state law and federal law and of my children’s rights and my rights], committing further state and federal conspiracies against my children’s and my rights (C.R.S. § 18-2-201 & 18 U.S.C. § 241), another count of ‘first degree official misconduct’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-404), one or more deprivations of my children’s and my rights under color of law (18 U.S.C. § 242), and one or more counts of indirect child abuse against my 5 minor children (C.R.S. § 18-6-401).

COUNTS 496-540

In July 2009, MORGAN and CHRISTIAN, in conspiring with and acting for Jeffco-CSS in their “child support scam” and for JANE as the alleged “victim,” filed a known false, sworn criminal complaint against me in Minnesota, for felony nonsupport of my children (case 40-CR-09-786), based on known false arrears balance figures provided at the time by DELGADILLO(?); and judge M. MICHAEL BAXTER—another of Minnesota’s “case fixing criminals”—issued a known false warrant for my arrest; each therefore committing state and federal conspiracies against my children’s and my rights (Minn. Stat. § 609.175 & 18 U.S.C. § 241), state and federal perjuries (Minn. Stat. § 609.48 & 18 U.S.C. § 1621), “honest service fraud” (18 U.S.C. § 1346), wire fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1343), official misconduct by public officers in Minnesota (Minn. Stat. § 609.43(3)), stalking (Minn. Stat. § 609.749), and one or more counts of indirect child abuse against my 5 minor children at the time (C.R.S. § 18-6-401).

COUNTS 541-563

On August 13, 2009, I applied for all services in Jefferson County’s “Fatherhood Initiative Program,” which was administered by Jeffco-CSS, but JANE threatened through my advocate in the program, RAY WASHINGTON, to have me arrested if I ever came to Colorado to see the kids and MOSS ordered WASHINGTON to deny me services and close my file, each committing state and federal conspiracies against my children’s and my rights (C.R.S. § 18-2-201 & 18 U.S.C. § 241); JANE committing further violations of the divorce orders (C.R.S. § 18-3-304), 5 further counts of child abuse (C.R.S. § 18-3-304), and a further count of domestic violence against me (C.R.S. § 18-6-800.3); and MOSS and WASHINGTON committing a count of ‘first degree official misconduct’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-404), a deprivation of my children’s and my rights under color of law (18 U.S.C. § 242), a count of indirect child abuse against my 5 minor children at the time (C.R.S. § 18-6-401), and failing to report (C.R.S. § 18-8-115) and becoming an accessory (C.R.S. § 18-8-105) in JANE’s crimes, child abuses, and domestic violence in the instance.

COUNTS 564-588

Also on August 13, 2009, I moved the Colorado courts for orders requiring JANE to provide our children’s contact information to me and to have our kids contact me at set times, but, despite everyone’s knowledge of JANE’s ongoing violations of the divorce orders and other child abuses and domestic violence, ongoing frauds upon the Colorado and Minnesota courts, and other crimes at the time, VOISINET and JACKSON conspired and “fixed” these actions against me too, each therefore committing state and federal conspiracies against my children’s and my rights (C.R.S. § 18-2-201 & 18 U.S.C. § 241); JANE committing further violations of the divorce orders (C.R.S. § 18-3-304), 5 further counts of child abuse (C.R.S. § 18-3-304), and a further count of domestic violence against me (C.R.S. § 18-6-800.3); and VOISINET and JACKSON each committing another count of ‘first degree official misconduct’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-404), another deprivation of my children’s and my rights under color of law (18 U.S.C. § 242), another count of indirect child abuse against my 5 minor children at the time (C.R.S. § 18-6-401), and failing to report (C.R.S. § 18-8-115), and failing to report (C.R.S. § 18-8-115) and becoming an accessory (C.R.S. § 18-8-105) in JANE’s crimes, child abuses, and domestic violence in the instance.

COUNTS 589-613

In the fall of 2009, in an attempt to restart my career, I renewed my efforts to obtain my ‘tools and necessary work equipment’ and other personal property that JANE continued to hold hostage after her divorce; and over the next few months, I filed 104 court documents to obtain my things, but VOISINET denied all my motions and JACKSON affirmed his decisions, each therefore committing state and federal conspiracies against my children’s and my rights (C.R.S. § 18-2-201 & 18 U.S.C. § 241); JANE committing further violations of the divorce orders (C.R.S. § 18-3-304), 5 further counts of child abuse (C.R.S. § 18-3-304), and one or more further counts of domestic violence against me (C.R.S. § 18-6-800.3); and VOISINET and JACKSON each committing another count of ‘first degree official misconduct’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-404), another deprivation of my children’s and my rights under color of law (18 U.S.C. § 242), another count of indirect child abuse against my 5 minor children (C.R.S. § 18-6-401), and failing to report (C.R.S. § 18-8-115), and failing to report (C.R.S. § 18-8-115) and becoming an accessory (C.R.S. § 18-8-105) in JANE’s crimes, child abuses, and domestic violence in the instance.

COUNTS 614-653

On June 16, 2010, I was falsely arrested and falsely imprisoned for the 5th time and falsely charged with felony nonsupport of my children on BAXTER’s false warrant; BAXTER, MORGAN and CHRISTIAN all conspiring with and acting, without authority or jurisdiction, for Jeffco-CSS (MOSS) in their “child support scam” and for JANE as the alleged “victim,” each therefore committing state and federal conspiracies against my children’s and my rights (Minn. Stat. § 609.175 & 18 U.S.C. § 241), another ‘conspiracy to defraud the government’ (18 U.S.C. § 286), another false arrest and/or false imprisonment (Minn. Stat. § (?)), another count of ‘misconduct of public officer’ (Minn. Stat. § 609.43(3)), another count in the ‘pattern of stalking’ (Minn. Stat. § 609.749), treason (18 U.S.C. § 2381), and another count of indirect child abuse against my 5 minor children at the time (C.R.S. § 18-6-401). [Shortly after this, CHRISTIAN recognized his conflict of interest (being related to JANE’s sister) and handed off the “child support scam” to Nicollet County Attorney MICHELLE ZENDER FISCHER.]

COUNTS 654-665

On July 6, 2010, my oldest child became an adult and the following year was emancipated under Colorado law; but at no time, then or since, did Jeffco-CSS take the initiative to review and adjust the child support, as required by law; and therefore, JOHNSON and MOSS committed state and federal conspiracies against my children’s and my rights (C.R.S. § 18-2-201 & 18 U.S.C. § 241), another ‘conspiracy to defraud the government’ (18 U.S.C. § 286), another count of deprivation of my children’s and my rights under color of law (18 U.S.C. § 242), another count of ‘first degree official misconduct’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-404), and another count of indirect child abuse against my 4 minor children from then on (C.R.S. § 18-6-401).

COUNTS 666-749

In the months leading up to the jury trial in February 2011, I attempted several times to obtain exculpatory evidence and witness testimony for my defense, from JANE, JANE’s sister BECKY DOE, JANE’s sister SUE DOE, JOHNSON, MOSS, DELGADILLO, MUNSINGER, MORGAN, ZEHNDER FISCHER, CHRISTIAN, PERKINS, [and several others involved in the “child support scam”], but, according to the court administrator JOANNE KOPET—who was intimately involved in the conspiracies, stalking, and “child support scam” in Minnesota—no one responded, produced any documents, or even called the courthouse to inquire about my subpoenas; each therefore committing state and federal conspiracies against my children’s and my rights (C.R.S. § 18-2-201 or Minn. Stat. § 609.175 & 18 U.S.C. § 241), another count of ‘first degree official misconduct’ or ‘misconduct of public officer’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-404 or Minn. Stat. § 609.43), concealing physical evidence and witness testimony (C.R.S. § 18-8-610 or Minn. Stat. (?) & 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2)), another count of deprivation of rights under color of law (18 U.S.C. § 242), and another count of indirect child abuse against my 4 minor children at the time (C.R.S. § 18-6-401).

COUNTS 750-779

On or around February 28, 2011, MOSS and DELGADILLO(?) conspired with MORGAN and ZENDER FISCHER (C.R.S. § 18-2-201 or Minn. Stat. § 609.175 & 18 U.S.C. § 241) to enter the known false arrears balance figures at the time as evidence in the jury trial, ZENDER FISCHER suborned both perjuries (Minn. Stat. § 609.48 (or 609.05) & 18 U.S.C. § 1622), MORGAN committed both perjuries (Minn. Stat. § 609.48 & 18 U.S.C. § 1621) by falsely testifying about the arrears balance and my payments toward child support, and BAXTER knowingly allowed both perjuries—i.e. carried out the frauds upon the jury, and was therefore a principal (Minn. Stat. § 609.05 & 18 U.S.C. § 2) in the conspiracies and perjuries.

[On March 1, 2011, I was falsely convicted in Minnesota of felony nonsupport of my children—the culmination of hundreds of crimes by over one hundred Colorado and Minnesota officials, all knowingly participating in racketeering, money laundering, and treason.]

COUNTS 780-791

On July 14, 2011, my second child became an adult and the following year was emancipated under Colorado law; but at no time, then or since, did Jeffco-CSS take the initiative to review and adjust the child support, as required by law; and therefore, JOHNSON and MOSS committed state and federal conspiracies against my children’s and my rights (C.R.S. § 18-2-201 & 18 U.S.C. § 241), another ‘conspiracy to defraud the government’ (18 U.S.C. § 286), another count of deprivation of my children’s and my rights under color of law (18 U.S.C. § 242), another count of ‘first degree official misconduct’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-404), and another count of indirect child abuse against my 3 minor children from then on (C.R.S. § 18-6-401).

COUNTS 792-829

In August 2011, ZEHNDER FISCHER and BAXTER orchestrated a blatant fraud upon the Minnesota court to cause the illegal forfeiture of my $5,000.00 bail to Jeffco-CSS for JANE, committing state and federal conspiracies (Minn. Stat. § 609.175 & 18 U.S.C. § 241), “honest services fraud” (18 U.S.C. § 1346), extortion (Minn. Stat. § 609.903 & 18 U.S.C. § 1951 to 1960), and another count of indirect child abuse against my 3 minor children at the time (C.R.S. § 18-6-401); MORGAN and KOPET caused the extorted $5,000.00 to be sent to Jeffco-CSS, committing state and federal conspiracies (Minn. Stat. § 609.175 & 18 U.S.C. § 241), aiding in extortion (Minn. Stat. § 609.903 & 18 U.S.C. §§ 1951 to 1960), mail or wire fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1341 or 1343), and another count of indirect child abuse against my 3 minor children at the time (C.R.S. § 18-6-401); MOSS and DELGADILLO(?) happily participated in state and federal conspiracies (C.R.S. § 18-2-201 & 18 U.S.C. § 241) and the racketeering (C.R.S. §§ 18-17-101 to 18-17-109 & 18 U.S.C. §§ 1951 to 1960) by receiving the extorted money for JANE, and committed another count of indirect child abuse against my 3 minor children at the time (C.R.S. § 18-6-401); and JANE happily participated in state and federal conspiracies (C.R.S. § 18-2-201 & 18 U.S.C. § 241), received the extorted money (18 U.S.C. § 880), and committed another count of direct child abuse against our 3 minor children at the time (C.R.S. § 18-6-401).

COUNTS 830-877

On December 16, 2011, I was falsely arrested and falsely imprisoned for the 6th time; ZEHNDER FISCHER, BAXTER, MORGAN and CHRISTIAN all conspiring with and acting for Jeffco-CSS (MOSS) in their “child support scam” and for JANE as the alleged “victim,” each therefore committing state and federal conspiracies against my children’s and my rights (Minn. Stat. § 609.175 & 18 U.S.C. § 241), another ‘conspiracy to defraud the government’ (18 U.S.C. § 286), another false arrest and/or false imprisonment (Minn. Stat. § (?)), another count of ‘misconduct of public officer’ (Minn. Stat. § 609.43(3)), another count in the ‘pattern of stalking’ (Minn. Stat. § 609.749), treason (18 U.S.C. § 2381), and another count of indirect child abuse against my 3 minor children at the time (C.R.S. § 18-6-401).

COUNTS 878-917

In January 2012, while I was in jail, with the intent to influence the sentence, JANE and MOSS conspired with MORGAN, ZENDER FISCHER, and BAXTER (C.R.S. § 18-2-201 or Minn. Stat. § 609.175 & 18 U.S.C. § 241) to obtain a “No Contact Order” preventing me from contacting our five children, including our adult children, and to obtain an order requiring me to pay further undue child support, as conditions of my probation; JANE and MOSS provided perjured arrears balance statements and other unknown documents, committing state and federal perjuries (Minn. Stat. § 609.48 & 18 U.S.C. § 1621), “honest services fraud” (18 U.S.C. § 1346), and mail or wire fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1341 or 1343); ZENDER FISCHER and MORGAN suborned (Minn. Stat. § 609.48 (or 609.05) & 18 U.S.C. § 1622) and committed the perjuries and other frauds upon the court (Minn. Stat. § 609.48 & 18 U.S.C. § 1621 and/or 1346); and BAXTER knowingly allowed and carried out the frauds upon his court and was therefore a principal (Minn. Stat. § 609.05 & 18 U.S.C. § 2) in the conspiracies and frauds, issued a known illegal No Contact Order, making a ‘false writing’ (18 U.S.C. § 1001) and committing another deprivation of my adult children’s and my rights under color of law (18 U.S.C. § 242), another ‘misconduct of a public officer’ (Minn. Stat. § 609.43), issued a known illegal order requiring me to pay further undue child support, making another ‘false writing’ (18 U.S.C. § 1001) and committing another ‘fictitious obligation’ against me (18 U.S.C. § 514) and another ‘misconduct of a public officer’ (Minn. Stat. § 609.43), and later deprived me of my right (18 U.S.C. § 242) to copies of the unknown documents which were used to obtain and justify his illegal No Contact Order and unjust sentence; and all involved therefore committing an indirect act of child abuse against my 3 minor children at the time (C.R.S. § 18-6-401).

COUNTS 917-933

Following my release from jail in April 2012, JANE and MOSS began conspiring with my Minnesota probation agent JULIA KRAEMER (Minn. Stat. § 609.175 & 18 U.S.C. § 241), with the intent to cause as many false arrests and imprisonments as possible; on July 1, 2012, JANE made another false report to the Jefferson County Sheriff’s Department in Colorado (C.R.S. § 18-8-111), this time falsely claiming that I had left messages on, and had sent texts to, my daughter’s cellphone, in violation of the known illegal No Contact Order, and faxed the false report to KRAEMER (committing wire fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1343); KRAEMER filed it and requested another known false warrant for my arrest, committing ‘misconduct of a public officer’ (Minn. Stat. § 609.43); BAXTER joined the conspiracy (Minn. Stat. § 609.175 & 18 U.S.C. § 241) and issued another false warrant for my arrest (18 U.S.C. § 1001), committing another ‘misconduct of a public officer’ (Minn. Stat. § 609.43); and all involved therefore committing an indirect act of child abuse against my 3 minor children at the time (C.R.S. § 18-6-401).

COUNTS 934-989

On July 2, 2012, I was tasered, falsely arrested and falsely imprisoned for the 7th time; ZEHNDER FISCHER, BAXTER, MORGAN, CHRISTIAN, and KRAEMER all conspiring with and acting for Jeffco-CSS (MOSS) in their “child support scam” and for JANE as the alleged “victim,” each therefore committing state and federal conspiracies against my children’s and my rights (Minn. Stat. § 609.175 & 18 U.S.C. § 241), another ‘conspiracy to defraud the government’ (18 U.S.C. § 286), another false arrest and/or false imprisonment (Minn. Stat. § (?)), another count of ‘misconduct of public officer’ (Minn. Stat. § 609.43(3)), another count in the ‘pattern of stalking’ (Minn. Stat. § 609.749), treason (18 U.S.C. § 2381), and another count of indirect child abuse against my 3 minor children at the time (C.R.S. § 18-6-401).

COUNTS 990-1053

On July 23, 2012, I was falsely arrested and falsely imprisoned for the 8th time; ZEHNDER FISCHER, BAXTER, MORGAN, CHRISTIAN, KRAEMER, and judge ALLISON KREHBIEL—another of Minnesota’s “case fixing criminals”—all conspiring with and acting for Jeffco-CSS (MOSS) in their “child support scam” and for JANE as the alleged “victim,” each therefore committing state and federal conspiracies against my children’s and my rights (Minn. Stat. § 609.175 & 18 U.S.C. § 241), another ‘conspiracy to defraud the government’ (18 U.S.C. § 286), another false arrest and/or false imprisonment (Minn. Stat. § (?)), another count of ‘misconduct of public officer’ (Minn. Stat. § 609.43(3)), another count in the ‘pattern of stalking’ (Minn. Stat. § 609.749), treason (18 U.S.C. § 2381), and another count of indirect child abuse against my 3 minor children at the time (C.R.S. § 18-6-401). [And KREHBIEL and ZEHNDER FISCHER orchestrating the “case fixing” in Nicollet County (case 52-CR-12-278)—see separate criminal complaints.]

COUNTS 1054-1065

On January 16, 2013, my third child became an adult and the following year was emancipated under Colorado law; but at no time, then or since, did Jeffco-CSS take the initiative to review and adjust the child support, as required by law; and therefore, JOHNSON and MOSS committed state and federal conspiracies against my children’s and my rights (C.R.S. § 18-2-201 & 18 U.S.C. § 241), another ‘conspiracy to defraud the government’ (18 U.S.C. § 286), another count of deprivation of my children’s and my rights under color of law (18 U.S.C. § 242), another count of ‘first degree official misconduct’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-404), and another count of indirect child abuse against my 2 minor children from then on (C.R.S. § 18-6-401).

COUNTS 1066-1077

On April 2, 2014, in my direct appeal of the jury verdict (A12-0794), Minnesota Supreme Court justice DAVID STRAS—knowing full well from numerous other appeals at the time (see A11-700), my 500-page “PETITION BOOK,” and 9 detailed criminal complaints, all sent to his boss, chief justice LORIE S. GILDEA [who wrongly dismissed A11-700, committing numerous state and federal crimes—see separate criminal complaints], that my child support obligations are paid-in-full, that the child support order and arrears balance are fictitious, that the registration case and criminal case in Le Sueur County were “fixed” against me, that I was railroaded into the false conviction, and that my direct appeal would have straightened out this very grave injustice—in conspiracy with GILDEA (Minn. Stat. § 609.175 & 18 U.S.C. § 241) and many other “case fixing criminals” in Minnesota’s appellate courts, wrongly ordered me to turn myself in on BAXTER’s known false warrant (for violating the No Contact Order) with the threat that, if I didn’t, my appeal would be dismissed, both committing a count of ‘misconduct of public officer’ (Minn. Stat. § 609.43(3)), ‘misprision of felony’ (18 U.S.C. § 242), making a ‘false document’ (18 U.S.C. § 1001), a count of indirect child abuse against my 2 minor children at the time (C.R.S. § 18-6-401), [and other state and federal crimes; and participating in the very obvious stalking, “case fixing,” racketeering, money laundering and treason taking place in Minnesota’s First Judicial District (Minn. Stat. § 609.749, Minn. Stat. § 609.903 et. seq, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1951 to 1960 CHAPTER 95-Racketeering, and 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961 to 1968 CHAPTER 96-Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations—see last entry below.] I turned myself in according to Minnesota’s rules of appellate procedure, criminal procedure, and civil procedure, but my appeal was dismissed anyway.

COUNTS 1078-1157

My 9th false imprisonment was brought about by ZEHNDER FISCHER, BAXTER, MORGAN, CHRISTIAN, KRAEMER, KREHBIEL, GILDEA, STRAS, [several “appeal fixing criminals” at the Court of Appeals, and others to be named in separate criminal complaints] all conspiring with and acting for Jeffco-CSS (MOSS) in their “child support scam” and for JANE as the alleged “victim,” each therefore committing state and federal conspiracies against my children’s and my rights (Minn. Stat. § 609.175 & 18 U.S.C. § 241), another ‘conspiracy to defraud the government’ (18 U.S.C. § 286), another false arrest and/or false imprisonment (Minn. Stat. § (?)), another count of ‘misconduct of public officer’ (Minn. Stat. § 609.43(3)), another count in the ‘pattern of stalking’ (Minn. Stat. § 609.749), treason (18 U.S.C. § 2381), and another count of indirect child abuse against my 2 minor children at the time (C.R.S. § 18-6-401).

COUNTS 1158-1169

To maximize my 9th false imprisonment, as instructed by Jeffco-CSS’s new manager/Title IV-D administrator ALVIN TAFOYA, caseworkers continued to transmit falsified arrears balances to LeSueur-CSS and ignored my discovery requests, and although MORGAN was no longer on my case, Le Sueur County Human Services director SUSAN RYNDA was more than happy to continue the crime spree against my family; TAFOYA and RYNDA committing state and federal conspiracies against my children’s and my rights (Minn. Stat. § 609.175 & 18 U.S.C. § 241), deprivation of my children’s and my rights (18 U.S.C. § 242), “honest service fraud” (18 U.S.C. § 1346), further counts of wire fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1343), and further counts of indirect child abuse against my 2 minor children at the time (C.R.S. § 18-6-401).

COUNTS 1170-1172

In preparation for the probation revocation hearing while in jail, I wrote to Jeffco-CSS caseworker GRIFFEN KOROSEC to obtain documents for my defense, sent her the pertinent facts alleging that my child support obligations are paid-in-full, and again requested reconciliation and closure of the Title IV-D case, but she ignored them, committing deprivation of my children’s and my rights (18 U.S.C. § 242), “honest service fraud” (18 U.S.C. § 1346), and a count of indirect child abuse against my 2 minor children at the time (C.R.S. § 18-6-401).

COUNTS 1173-1177

On July 31, 2014, I initiated Jeffco-CSS’s fifth administrative “review and adjustment” of the child support order and arrears balance, but it was ignored along with my discovery request to KOROSEC, on information and belief on TAFOYA’s orders, to further influence the judicial proceedings in Minnesota, and therefore TAFOYA and whoever else was involved committed state and federal conspiracies against my children’s and my rights (C.R.S. § 18-2-201 & 18 U.S.C. § 241), further counts of ‘first degree official misconduct’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-404), further deprivations of my children’s and my rights (18 U.S.C. § 242), and further counts of indirect child abuse against my 2 minor children at the time (C.R.S. § 18-6-401).

COUNTS 1178-1257

On August 4, 2014, my 10th and final false arrest and false imprisonment took place; which was brought about by ZEHNDER FISCHER, BAXTER, MORGAN, CHRISTIAN, KRAEMER, KREHBIEL, GILDEA, STRAS, [several other “appeal fixing criminals” at the Court of Appeals, and others to be named in separate criminal complaints] all conspiring with and acting for Jeffco-CSS (TAFOYA) in their “child support scam” and for JANE as the alleged “victim,” each therefore committing state and federal conspiracies against my children’s and my rights (Minn. Stat. § 609.175 & 18 U.S.C. § 241), another ‘conspiracy to defraud the government’ (18 U.S.C. § 286), another false arrest and/or false imprisonment (Minn. Stat. § (?)), another count of ‘misconduct of public officer’ (Minn. Stat. § 609.43(3)), another count in the ‘pattern of stalking’ (Minn. Stat. § 609.749), treason (18 U.S.C. § 2381), and another count of indirect child abuse against my 2 minor children at the time (C.R.S. § 18-6-401).

COUNTS 1258-1262

On August 14, 2014, the sentence in the Le Sueur County case was vacated by the “case fixing criminal” named MARK C. VANDELIST, who kept me in jail for the whole 4 months (the remainder of the jail sentence) knowing full well that the sentencing order was wholly void and who, as I now know, had joined the very grand state and federal conspiracies against my children’s and my rights (Minn. Stat. § 609.175 & 18 U.S.C. § 241), committing another* act of ‘misconduct of public officer’ (Minn. Stat. § 609.43(3), another* deprivation of my children’s and my rights (18 U.S.C. § 242), and another* count of indirect child abuse against my 2 minor children at the time (C.R.S. § 18-6-401)—*VANDELIST’s many crimes are alleged in separate criminal complaints.

COUNTS 1263-1267

On October 20, I was forced to take a plea deal in the Nicollet County case, due to the crimes by the “case fixing criminal” named TODD WESTPHAL, who refused to dismiss the case knowing full well that ZEHNDER FISCHER and KREHBIEL started it to fool the local people because I was exposing the whole racketeering scheme, and who, as I now know, had joined the very grand state and federal conspiracies against my children’s and my rights (Minn. Stat. § 609.175 & 18 U.S.C. § 241), committing another* act of ‘misconduct of public officer’ (Minn. Stat. § 609.43(3), another* deprivation of my children’s and my rights (18 U.S.C. § 242), and another* count of indirect child abuse against my 2 minor children at the time (C.R.S. § 18-6-401)—*WESTPHAL’s many crimes are alleged in separate criminal complaints.

COUNTS 1268-1300

During Jeffco-CSS’s fifth review of the Title IV-D case in Colorado in the fall of 2014, I wrote 2 detailed letters to Jeffco-CSS’s paralegal SUE PALMER, who, in conspiracy with STOKES and TAFOYA, refused to do a proper review, and on the 28th of October, PALMER unlawfully and illegally imputed a false monthly income of $7,000.00 for me into the child support worksheet and filed with the Colorado court a motion to modify the child support order from $1,717.92 to $1,361.00 per month (to support my two youngest children who were still minors at the time), each committing state and federal conspiracies against my children’s and my rights (C.R.S. § 18-2-201 & 18 U.S.C. § 241), a count of ‘conspiracy to defraud the government’ (18 U.S.C. § 286), 2 counts of ‘first degree official misconduct’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-404), 2 deprivations of my children’s and my rights (18 U.S.C. § 242), 2 counts of ‘fictitious obligations’ (18 U.S.C. § 514), and 2 counts of indirect child abuse against my 2 minor children at the time (C.R.S. § 18-6-401).

COUNTS 1301-1306

On October 23, KOROSEC (who never responded to my discovery request in July), who was also obviously conspiring with STOKES and TAFOYA at the time, finally called me to tell me that she would allow me to have a 90-day probationary driver’s license, but ignored my request for reconciliation of the arrears balance and refused to look into reimbursement of the $5,500.51 stolen from my children’s trust account, and therefore each committing state and federal conspiracies against my children’s and my rights (C.R.S. § 18-2-201 & 18 U.S.C. § 241), a count of ‘conspiracy to defraud the government’ (18 U.S.C. § 286), another count of ‘first degree official misconduct’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-404), another deprivation of my children’s and my rights (18 U.S.C. § 242), and another count of indirect child abuse against my 2 minor children (C.R.S. § 18-6-401).

COUNTS 1307-1386

During Jeffco-CSS’s fifth review of the Title IV-D case in Colorado in the fall of 2014, I called for TAFOYA and left eleven detailed messages on his voicemail requesting: 1) that he take full control of the “review and adjustment” process; 2) that he open a case for me in the “Responsible Fatherhood Program” and help me reestablish contact and visitation with my children; 3) that he take whatever action necessary to lift the suspension of my driver’s license; 4) that he obtain my letters to PALMER and KOROSEC, and fulfill my requests; 5) that he contact me if he had any trouble locating the evidence proving that my child support obligations are paid-in-full; 6) that he verify the facts and evidence, and administratively find and declare that my child support obligations are paid-in-full and the arrears balance is zero; 7) that he close the Title IV-D case; and 8) that he report his office’s knowledge of JANE’s crimes and child abuses to the Jefferson County Sheriff’s Department and Jefferson County Child Protective Services; but in spite of the facts, evidence, controlling law, and his duties to each of my 5 children and me, TAFOYA left me a voicemail essentially denying me all services by Jeffco-CSS and turning my case over to STOKES, who did not respond; and therefore TAFOYA and STOKES each committing state and federal conspiracies against my children’s and my rights (C.R.S. § 18-2-201 & 18 U.S.C. § 241), 8 counts of ‘first degree official misconduct’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-404), 8 counts of deprivation of my children’s and my rights (18 U.S.C. § 242), 2 counts of processing ‘fictitious obligations’ (18 U.S.C. § 514), 6 counts of breach of ‘duty to report crime (C.R.S. § 18-8-115), 6 counts of ‘misprision of felony’ (18 U.S.C. § 4), and 8 more counts of indirect child abuse against my 2 youngest children (C.R.S. § 18-6-401).

COUNTS 1387-1398

On November 17, 2014, my fourth child became an adult and the following year was emancipated under Colorado law; but at no time, then or since, did Jeffco-CSS take the initiative to review and adjust the child support, as required by law; and therefore, JOHNSON and TAFOYA committed state and federal conspiracies against my children’s and my rights (C.R.S. § 18-2-201 & 18 U.S.C. § 241), another ‘conspiracy to defraud the government’ (18 U.S.C. § 286), another count of deprivation of my children’s and my rights under color of law (18 U.S.C. § 242), another count of ‘first degree official misconduct’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-404), and another count of indirect child abuse against my 1 minor child from then on (C.R.S. § 18-6-401).

COUNTS 1399-1419

In December 2014, I sued JANE, Jeffco-CSS, and Jefferson County, in Minnesota (see case 40-CV-14-1149); but VANDELIST came to their rescue and unlawfully and illegally dismissed my lawsuit, then another “case fixing criminal” at the Minnesota Court of Appeals, EDWARD CLEARY, unlawfully and illegally dismissed my appeal, and finally another “case fixing criminal” in Minnesota’s federal courts, DONOVAN FRANK, unlawfully and illegally dismissed my federal action against the state’s “case fixing criminals”; each committing state and federal conspiracies against my children’s and my rights (C.R.S. § 18-2-201 & 18 U.S.C. § 241), ‘conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States’ (18 U.S.C. § 371), making ‘false writings’ (18 U.S.C. § 1001), [Biven’s] deprivations of my children’s and my rights under color of law (18 U.S.C. § 242), ‘misconduct of public officer’ (Minn. Stat. § 609.43(3), and indirect child abuse against my 1 minor child at the time (C.R.S. § 18-6-401).

COUNTS 1420-1446

In the fall of 2015, as part of my action to modify parental responsibilities in Colorado, I filed a motion to reinstate my driver’s license and attached evidence of Jeffco-CSS’s unlawful and illegal suspension of my driver’s license; but, although Jeffco-CSS did not respond, the case fixing criminal named JAMIN M. ALABISO unlawfully and illegally denied my motion without a hearing, and was then joined by the case fixing criminals named CHRISTOPHER CLAYTON ZENISEK and PHILIP JAMES MCNULTY to aid JANE and Jeffco-CSS in the continuation of their “crime sprees” against my family and their “child support scam” against the People of Colorado and the united States of America; each therefore committing state and federal conspiracies against my children’s and my rights (C.R.S. § 18-2-201 & 18 U.S.C. § 241), counts of ‘first degree official misconduct’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-404), counts of deprivation of my children’s and my rights (18 U.S.C. § 242), 2 counts of further processing ‘fictitious obligations’ (18 U.S.C. § 514), counts of breach of ‘duty to report crime (C.R.S. § 18-8-115), counts of ‘misprision of felony’ (18 U.S.C. § 4), and indirect child abuse against my last-remaining minor child (C.R.S. § 18-6-401). [Most of the crimes at the time by ALABISO, ZENISEK and MCNULTY were not related to the “child support scam” and are alleged in separate criminal complaints.]

COUNTS 1447-1458

On April 19, 2016, my youngest child became an adult and the following year was emancipated under Colorado law; but at no time, then or since, did Jeffco-CSS take the initiative to review and adjust the child support, as required by law; and therefore, JOHNSON and TAFOYA committed state and federal conspiracies against my children’s and my rights (C.R.S. § 18-2-201 & 18 U.S.C. § 241), another ‘conspiracy to defraud the government’ (18 U.S.C. § 286), another count of deprivation of my children’s and my rights under color of law (18 U.S.C. § 242), another count of ‘first degree official misconduct’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-404), and a final count of indirect child abuse against my last-remaining minor child (C.R.S. § 18-6-401).

COUNTS 1459-1548

In the summer of 2016, I sued Colorado’s original and present “case fixing criminals”—including NORTON, MUNSINGER, VOISINET, JACKSON, ALABISO, ZENISEK, and MCNULTY—in Colorado’s federal courts, giving the criminals, the state and the county yet another opportunity to stop the crime spree and “child support scam,” vacate Permanent Orders, and settle my claims; but the “case fixing criminals” masquerading as federal judges at the time— including magistrate GORDON P. GALLAGHER and judge LEWIS T. BABCOCK—came to their rescue and unlawfully and illegally dismissed my federal lawsuits to keep the “child support scam” going; each committing state and federal conspiracies against my children’s and my rights (C.R.S. § 18-2-201 & 18 U.S.C. § 241), ‘conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States’ (18 U.S.C. § 371), making ‘false writings’ (18 U.S.C. § 1001), deprivations of my children’s and my rights under color of law (18 U.S.C. § 242), ‘accessory after the fact’ (18 U.S.C. § 3), ‘misprision of felony’ (18 U.S.C. § 4), ‘first degree official misconduct’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-404), and state and federal acts of treason (C.R.S. § 18-11-101 & 18 U.S.C. § 2381).

COUNTS 1549-1698

In the fall of 2016, I put the COUNTY OF JEFFERSON and the STATE OF COLORADO on notice of my intent to sue, providing the leaders of both entities the names of all their officials and employees who were involved in the “child support scam” and “crime sprees” against my family over the years; I wrote to TAFOYA to give him a final opportunity to: 1) administratively find and declare that my child support obligations are paid-in-full and the arrears balance is zero; 2) administratively find and declare that the child support order is void and unenforceable; 3) to reinstate my driver’s license; 4) to reconcile the Title IV-D case; 5) to close the Title IV-D case; and 6) to open a case for my family in the “Responsible Fatherhood Program”; and I wrote again to the Board of County Commissioners—LIBBY SZABO, CASEY TIGHE, and DONALD ROSIER—and to Colorado Attorney CYNTHIA H. COFFMAN and other state leaders to oversee the reconciliation of the Title IV-D case and termination of the continued “child support scam” and “crime sprees” against my family; but no one responded or took any action whatsoever, therefore each of the five named suspects committing state and federal conspiracies against my children’s and my rights (C.R.S. § 18-2-201 & 18 U.S.C. § 241), ‘conspiracy to commit’ theft of public funds from the American People (18 U.S.C. § 371), at least 6 counts of ‘first degree official misconduct’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-404), at least 6 counts of deprivation of my children’s and my rights (18 U.S.C. § 242), 2 more counts of processing ‘fictitious obligations’ (18 U.S.C. § 514), 6 counts of breach of ‘duty to report crime’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-115), 6 counts of ‘misprision of felony’ (18 U.S.C. § 4), state and federal ‘accessory after the fact’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-105 & 18 U.S.C. § 3), [and any other crimes discovered during the grand jury investigation].

COUNTS 1699-1711

In May 2017, unbeknownst to me, JANE and Jeffco-CSS legal technician KRISTIE WILLIAMSON, apparently in conspiracy with TAFOYA, Jefferson County Attorney MARGARET A. DAVIS—who has been involved in the “crime spree” against my family and the “child support scam” since the Title IV-D case was opened in May 2006 and has known all along that my child support obligations are paid-in-full, that the child support order is void, and that she, STOKES, WAKEMAN, JOHNSON, MOSS, TAFOYA, and the other “child support scammers,” the past and present county commissioners, and other county employees, the original and present “case fixing criminals,” and everyone else involved in the child support matters in Colorado and Minnesota over the past 11 years, including the highest-authorities in both states, know full well that my child support obligations are paid-in-full and that they are enforcing a fictitious and void child support order and arrears balance—[and likely many others], committed state and federal perjuries (C.R.S. § 18-8-502 & 18 U.S.C. § 1621) on their “Obligee’s Verification For Verified Entry Of Judgment”; WILLIAMSON, TAFOYA, and/or DAVIS suborned JANE’s perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1622); and each committed state and federal conspiracies against my children’s and my rights (C.R.S. § 18-2-201 & 18 U.S.C. § 241); [and any other crimes discovered during the grand jury investigation].

COUNTS 1712-1783

On June 13, 2017, unbeknownst to me, DAVIS started the present crime spree by secretly filing a motion on behalf of the intervenor for a judgment against my “strawman” (the respondent, “JOHN M. HENTGES”) in the amount of Jeffco-CSS’s known fictitious arrears balance, with the intent to obtain a final fictitious judgment under color of law against my strawman and to enforce the fictitious judgment under color of law against me, the living human being with the Christian given-name John Mark Hentges, until paid; and purposely, unlawfully and illegally, failed to serve a copy on my strawman or me; committing state and federal conspiracies against my children’s and my rights (C.R.S. § 18-2-201 & 18 U.S.C. § 241) with WAKEMAN, STOKES, JOHNSON, MOSS, TAFOYA, [and others presently involved in the “child support scam”]; another count each of ‘deprivation of my children’s and my rights under color of law (18 U.S.C. § 242); another count each of processing a ‘fictitious obligation’ (18 U.S.C. § 514); another count each of ‘identity theft’ (C.R.S. § 18-5-902); another count each of ‘first degree criminal misconduct’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-404); another count each of ‘offering a false instrument for recording’ (C.R.S. § 18-5-114); another count each of “honest service fraud” (18 U.S.C. § 1346); another count each of mail fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1341); another count each of ‘conspiracy to defraud the government with respect to claims’ (18 U.S.C. § 286); another count each of ‘conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States’ (18 U.S.C. § 371); another count each of making or presenting ‘false, fictitious or fraudulent claims’ to the government (18 U.S.C. § 287); [and any other crimes discovered during the grand jury investigation].

COUNTS 1784-1805

On July 17, 2017, ALABISO, in conspiracy with DAVIS [and likely many others], purposely, unlawfully and illegally, failed to provide me an opportunity to be heard on the matter (18 U.S.C. § 242), and forged and secretly entered on the public record in case 05DR212 a known false judgment against my “strawman” (the respondent, “JOHN M. HENTGES”) in the amount of Jeffco-CSS’s known fictitious arrears balance; each therefore committing state and federal conspiracies against my children’s and my rights (C.R.S. § 18-2-201 & 18 U.S.C. § 241); another count each of ‘deprivation of my children’s and my rights under color of law (18 U.S.C. § 242); another count each of creating a ‘fictitious obligation’ (18 U.S.C. § 514); another count each of ‘identity theft’ (C.R.S. § 18-5-902); another count each of ‘first degree criminal misconduct’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-404); another count each of ‘offering a false instrument for recording’ (C.R.S. § 18-5-114); another count each of “honest service fraud” (18 U.S.C. § 1346); another count each of ‘conspiracy to defraud the government with respect to claims’ (18 U.S.C. § 286); another count each of ‘conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States’ (18 U.S.C. § 371); another count each of making or presenting ‘false, fictitious or fraudulent claims’ to the government (18 U.S.C. § 287); [and any other crimes discovered during the grand jury investigation].

COUNTS 1806-11,309

On April 19, 2017, my youngest child turned 19 years of age, and Jeffco-CSS’s present “child support scammers” (TAFOYA & MOSS, in conspiracy with JOHNSON, WAKEMAN, STOKES, DAVIS, [and others involved along the way], made Jeffco-CSS’s last monthly addition to the arrears balance in the amount of $1,717.92, which is the same monthly amount that was originally, and unlawfully and illegally, ordered in 2006 to support all five of my minor children, and which—just like nonpayment of a legitimate monthly child support obligation would be considered a monthly judgment against the debtor in that amount—evidences the commission by each involved of at least 132 monthly (June 2006 to April 2017) “honest service frauds” (18 U.S.C. § 1346); at least 132 counts each of state and federal conspiracies against my children’s and my rights (C.R.S. § 18-2-201 & 18 U.S.C. § 241; between the various officials who had knowledge of the monthly crimes); at least 132 counts each of ‘deprivation of rights under color of law’ (18 U.S.C. § 242; by the various officials who failed to correct the account and knowingly made the false entries); at least 132 counts each of creating the ‘fictitious [monthly] obligations’ against me (18 U.S.C. § 514); at least 132 counts each of ‘conspiracy to defraud the government with respect to claims’ (18 U.S.C. § 286); at least 132 counts each of ‘conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States’ (18 U.S.C. § 371); at least 132 counts each of making or presenting ‘false, fictitious or fraudulent claims’ to the government (18 U.S.C. § 287); at least 132 counts each of ‘theft or bribery concerning programs receiving federal funds’ (18 U.S.C. § 666); at least 132 counts each of ‘offering a false instrument for recording’ (C.R.S. § 18-5-114); at least 132 counts each of ‘identity theft’ (C.R.S. § 18-5-902; while Jeffco-CSS used my strawman’s name in their racketeering scheme and money laundering operation); at least 132 counts each of ‘first degree criminal misconduct’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-404); [and any other crimes discovered during the grand jury investigation].

COUNTS 11,310-

I ask the grand jury to investigate other crimes not alleged above that have been committed against my family including: ‘criminal solicitation’ (C.R.S. § 18-2-301); ‘false imprisonment’ (C.R.S. § 18-3-303); ‘coercion of involuntary servitude’ (C.R.S. § 18-3-503); ‘obtaining control over any stolen thing of value’ (C.R.S. § 18-4-404); ‘criminal mischief’ (C.R.S. § 18-4-501); ‘criminal possesssion of a forged instrument’ (C.R.S. § 18-5-105); ‘issuing a false financial statement…’ (C.R.S. § 18-5-209); ‘computer crime’ (C.R.S. § 18-5.5-102); ‘compounding’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-108); ‘failing to disclose a conflict of interest’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-308); ‘official oppression’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-403); ‘issuing a false certificate’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-406); ‘protection of privacy of child victims and child witnesses’ (18 U.S.C. § 403); ‘contracts, deeds, and powers of attorney’ (18 U.S.C. § 495); ‘possession of false papers to defraud United States’ (18 U.S.C. § 1002); ‘official certificates and writing’ (18 U.S.C. § 1018); ‘bank fraud’ (18 U.S.C. § 1344); ‘attempt and conspiracy’ (18 U.S.C. § 1349); ‘obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies and committees’ (18 U.S.C. § 1505); ‘peonage’ (18 U.S.C. § 1581); ‘obstruction of mails generally’ (18 U.S.C. § 1701); ‘false entries…’ (18 U.S.C. § 2073); ‘coercion’ (Minn. Stat. § 609.27); ‘fraudulent or [forged] statements’ (Minn. Stat. § 609.7475); ‘criminal defamation’ (Minn. Stat. § 609.765); and any other state or federal crime outside of the criminal statutes and codes.


EXCERPTS FROM MY CRIMINAL COMPLAINT v. “CFCs”:
[Alleging probable cause of the crimes committed against my family during the “case fixing crime spree” by the “case fixing criminals” (CFCs) in the Colorado First Judicial District (CFJD).]

COUNTS 1-3

I am informed and believe that the CFCs do not have valid oaths of office on file and are not bonded as required by Colorado’s constitution and general laws (and have apparently been officiating as such for many years), and are therefore guilty of ‘impersonating public servants’ in violation of C.R.S. § 18-8-113.

COUNTS 4-48

In addition, on at least three occasions, in conspiracy, CFC ALABISO and CFC ZENISEK intentionally refused to disqualify themselves from case 2005DR212 and CFC MCNULTY intentionally refused to address the situation as chief judge, as required by state and federal law, in spite everyone’s knowledge that they had lost whatever jurisdiction and authority they thought1 they had when they committed their first crime against my family in November 2015; each therefore committing state and federal conspiracies against my children’s and my rights (C.R.S. § 18-2-201 & 18 U.S.C. § 241), counts of ‘first degree official misconduct’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-404), counts of deprivation of my children’s and my rights (18 U.S.C. § 242), and counts of indirect child abuse against my last-remaining minor child (C.R.S. § 18-6-401).

1 It is now well-established on the record in case 2005DR212 that the “case fixing criminals” involved in the “case fixing crime spree” since 2005 and “child support scam” since 2006 lost whatever jurisdiction and authority they may have had over my “strawman” (the respondent JOHN M HENTGES) and the subject matter at hand, and rendered their orders void, upon the commission of their first crime against my family, or for any one of numerous other reasons repeatedly alleged, proved, and reproved on the public record over the years.

COUNTS 49-51

Furthermore, because the CFCs are knowingly acting without authority or jurisdiction in case 2005DR212 (and likely in 100s of other cases), they are committing treason against my family and the People of Colorado under C.R.S. § 18-11-101.

COUNTS 52-54

Furthermore, because the CFCs owe an allegiance to the United States—not only under our U.S. Constitution but also as agents in the administration of the provisions of the Title IV-D Program—their adherence to the INTERVENOR’s treasonous plan to cheat the Title IV-D Program, their facilitation of the INTERVENOR’s racketeering and money laundering operation, and/or their ongoing acts without authority or jurisdiction in case 2005DR212, makes them each guilty of one or more counts of treason against the People of the united States of America under 18 U.S.C. § 2381.

COUNTS 55-57

Furthermore, because the CFCs owe an allegiance to the United States—not only under our U.S. Constitution but also as agents in the administration of the provisions of the Title IV-D Program—have knowledge of the INTERVENOR’s treasonous plan to cheat the Title IV-D Program and other traitorous plots in Colorado, and have concealed the treason in Colorado, they are each guilty of one or more counts of misprision of treason according to 18 U.S.C. § 2382.

COUNTS 58-69

In early-October 2015, I filed my “motion to modify parental responsibilities” and 280-page EXHIBIT BOOK in 2005DR212. From the file and this filing, the CFCs knew early in the case of CAROL’s and the INTERVENOR’s decade-long “crime sprees” against my family, that CAROL had continued to deny contact and visitation and commit other child abuses and acts of domestic violence against me, and that the INTERVENOR had continued to enforce a known fictitious and void child support order and arrears balance and to commit, or attempt to commit, criminal extortion and other treasonous crimes against me (under ‘color of law’ against my “strawman”), but instead of stopping the continued crime sprees or reporting the crimes as required by law, they conspired and purposely failed to act or report the crimes (and have concealed their knowledge of the criminal misconduct to this day); each therefore committing state and federal conspiracies in violation of C.R.S. § 18-2-201 and 18 U.S.C. § 241, the state crime of failing their ‘duty to report a crime’ under C.R.S. § 18-8-115, the federal crime of ‘misprision of felony’ (18 U.S.C. § 4).

COUNTS 70-99

As soon as I began calling in early-November 2015 to follow up on my motion, the ongoing state and federal conspiracies (C.R.S. § 18-2-201 and 18 U.S.C. § 241) became evident between the present CFCs to “fix” each matter against me; and to carry out the object of the first conspiracy—to aid CAROL in the cover up of her crimes, CFC ZENISEK purposely failed to timely adjudicate (within 49 days of filing) the parts of my motion to modify parenting responsibilities requiring judicial action on my requests for court-ordered parenting time over Thanksgiving and Christmas and for restoration of contact with my daughter; each therefore committing a count of ‘first degree official misconduct’ in violation of C.R.S. § 18-8-404, ‘deprivation of rights under color of law’ according to 18 U.S.C. § 242, an indirect act of child abuse against my daughter in violation of C.R.S. § 18-6-401, and each also becoming a principal or an accessory and/or aiding in CAROL’s felonious denials of contact and parenting time at the time (which continued throughout the proceeding until our daughter became an adult in April 2016), and in CAROL’s acts of domestic violence against me (which have continued unabated to this day), in violation of state and federal law, including C.R.S. §§ 18-2-101, 18-8-105, and 18 U.S.C. §§ 1 and 2.

COUNTS 97-120

In December 2015, to carry out the object of the next conspiracy—to aid the INTERVENOR in the cover up of their crimes, CFC ALABISO denied my motion to reinstate my driver’s license without a hearing on the matter, CFC ZENISEK ignored the CFC ALABISO’s crimes, and CFC MCNULTY denied my motion to reopen the driver’s license matter; each therefore committing another count of ‘first degree official misconduct’ under C.R.S. § 18-8-404, ‘offering a false instrument for recording’ under C.R.S. § 18-5-114, ‘deprivation of rights under color of law’ under 18 U.S.C. § 242, an indirect act of child abuse against my daughter under C.R.S. § 18-6-401, and each also becoming a principal or an accessory and/or aiding in the INTERVENOR’s ongoing crimes which became evident in my motion, in violation of C.R.S. §§ 18-2-101 & 18-8-105, and 18 U.S.C. §§ 1 & 2.

COUNTS 121-153

In conspiracy(3), each of the CFCs committed multiple forgeries in violation of C.R.S. § 18-5-102 by falsely making court orders which would negatively affect my legal rights and facilitate the ongoing crime sprees (one of several methods of “case fixing” by “fraud upon the court”): CFC ALABISO committed the first forgery in his order denying my motion to reinstate driver’s license; CFC ZENISEK forged his first order on December 24, 2015; CFC MCNULTY forged his first order in January 2016; and to date, the CFCs have conspired and committed over 30 forgeries (each a class 5 felony) in their orders.

COUNTS 154-169

In January 2016, CFC ZENISEK—in perhaps the most blatant and obvious act of “case fixing” to date, and in conspiracy with the other CFCs (C.R.S. § 18-2-201 and 18 U.S.C. § 241)—scheduled the hearing on my motion to modify parental responsibilities on May 17th, after my daughter became an adult in April, thus ending all matters except my request for an order requiring CAROL to pay for “parental alienation” reunification therapy, and CFC MCNULTY deprived me of my right to have the void order set aside; each committing another count of ‘first degree official misconduct’ under C.R.S. § 18-8-404, ‘offering a false instrument for recording’ under C.R.S. § 18-5-114, another indirect act of child abuse against my daughter under C.R.S. § 18-6-401, and CFC MCNULTY committing ‘deprivation of rights under color of law’ under 18 U.S.C. § 242.

COUNTS 170-187

At this time I filed motions to disqualify CFC ALABISO and CFC ZENISEK on the grounds that they had lost jurisdiction at the time of their first crime against my family (which automatically rendered their orders void), but both refused to recuse themselves (and have continued to knowingly issue void orders in the case to this day), and CFC MCNULTY purposely failed to disqualify CFC ALABISO and CFC ZENISEK and set aside their void orders and entered false and void orders denying my motions on the record; each committing state and federal conspiracies (C.R.S. § 18-2-201 and 18 U.S.C. § 241), another count of ‘first degree official misconduct’ under C.R.S. § 18-8-404, ‘offering a false instrument for recording’ under C.R.S. § 18-5-114, another indirect act of child abuse against my daughter under C.R.S. § 18-6-401, and another ‘deprivation of rights under color of law’ under 18 U.S.C. § 242.

COUNTS 188-193

In February 2016, CFC MCNULTY failed to take action on my FIRST CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, committing another count of ‘first degree official misconduct’ under C.R.S. § 18-8-404, ‘misprision of felony’ under 18 U.S.C. § 4, another ‘deprivation of rights under color of law’ under 18 U.S.C. § 242, another indirect act of child abuse against my daughter under C.R.S. § 18-6-401, and becoming an accessory in the crimes reported to him under C.R.S. § 18-8-105 and 18 U.S.C. § 3.

COUNTS 194-199

In March 2016, CFC ZENISEK fraudulently denied my FIRST MOTION AND AFFIDAVIT FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE OF FRAUD UPON THE COURT AND TO SET ASIDE PERMANENT ORDERS, without a hearing, and without jurisdiction or authority, committing another count of ‘first degree official misconduct’ under C.R.S. § 18-8-404, another ‘offering a false instrument for recording’ under C.R.S. § 18-5-114, another ‘deprivation of rights under color of law’ under 18 U.S.C. § 242, another indirect act of child abuse against my daughter under C.R.S. § 18-6-401, and another act of treason under C.R.S. § 18-11-101 and 18 U.S.C. § 2381.

COUNTS 200-214

In April 2016, each of the CFCs ignored my NOTICE OF INTENT TO SUE AND PRESS CHARGES and continued in the case without jurisdiction and authority, committing another state and federal conspiracy under C.R.S. § 18-2-201 and 18 U.S.C. § 241, another ‘deprivation of rights under color of law’ under 18 U.S.C. § 242, and another act of treason under C.R.S. § 18-11-101 and 18 U.S.C. § 2381.

COUNTS 215-241

At the hearing on May 17, 2016, CFC ZENISEK—in conspiracy with CFC MCNULTY and CFC ALABISO, without a word beforehand, and knowing for months that I, at great expense of time and money, had filed numerous court documents in preparation for the hearing, had paid $500 to my expert witness, and had paid for a round-trip flight to Colorado for the hearing—defrauded local, state and federal law enforcement authorities into believing that I was the criminal and CFC ZENISEK was in danger, showed up for the hearing without jurisdiction or authority, and announced that his court did not have jurisdiction and dismissed the last-remaining issue raised in my motion to modify parental responsibilities filed 7.5 months earlier; each committing state and federal conspiracies under C.R.S. § 18-2-201 and 18 U.S.C. § 241, a ‘criminal attempt’ under C.R.S. § 18-2-101 to have me falsely arrested and imprisoned, a ‘criminal attempt’ under C.R.S. § 18-2-101 to cause further harm to my case, my family, and other property, another count of ‘first degree official misconduct’ under C.R.S. § 18-8-404, another ‘offering a false instrument for recording’ under C.R.S. § 18-5-114, another ‘deprivation of rights under color of law’ under 18 U.S.C. § 242, and another act of treason under C.R.S. § 18-11-101 and 18 U.S.C. § 2381.

Copied and pasted from my criminal complaint v. Jeffco-DHS for context:

COUNTS 1700-1712

In May 2017, unbeknownst to me, CAROL and Jeffco-CSS legal technician KRISTIE WILLIAMSON, apparently in conspiracy with TAFOYA, Jefferson County Attorney MARGARET A. DAVIS—who has been involved in the “crime spree” against my family and the “child support scam” since the Title IV-D case was opened in May 2006 and has known all along that my child support obligations are paid-in-full, that the child support order is void, and that she, STOKES, WAKEMAN, JOHNSON, MOSS, TAFOYA, and the other “child support scammers,” the past and present county commissioners, and other county employees, the original and present “case fixing criminals,” and everyone else involved in the child support matters in Colorado and Minnesota over the past 11 years, including the highest-authorities in both states, know full well that my child support obligations are paid-in-full and that they are enforcing a fictitious and void child support order and arrears balance—[and likely many others], committed state and federal perjuries (C.R.S. § 18-8-502 & 18 U.S.C. § 1621) on their “Obligee’s Verification For Verified Entry Of Judgment”; WILLIAMSON, TAFOYA, and/or DAVIS suborned CAROL’s perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1622); and each committed state and federal conspiracies against my children’s and my rights (C.R.S. § 18-2-201 & 18 U.S.C. § 241);

COUNTS 242-297

On June 13, 2017, unbeknownst to me, in conspiracy with the present CFCs and all knowing of their lack of jurisdiction and authority, Jeffco-Attorney MARGARET A. DAVIS started the present crime spree by secretly filing a motion on behalf of the INTERVENOR—for a judgment against my “strawman” (the respondent, “JOHN M. HENTGES”) in the amount of Jeffco-CSS’s known fictitious arrears balance, with the intent to obtain a final fictitious judgment under color of law against my strawman and to enforce the fictitious judgment under color of law against me, the living human being with the Christian given-name John Mark Hentges, until paid—and purposely, unlawfully, and illegally failing to serve a copy on my strawman or me; each of the present CFCs and DAVIS therefore committing state and federal conspiracies against my children’s and my rights (C.R.S. § 18-2-201 & 18 U.S.C. § 241), two counts each of a class B federal felony (18 U.S.C. § 514) by further processing the known fictitious and void child support order and arrears balance—two financial instruments issued under the authority of Title IV-D of the Social Security Act and various other state and federal laws, ‘deprivation of my children’s and my rights under color of law (18 U.S.C. § 242), ‘first degree criminal misconduct’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-404), ‘offering a false instrument for recording’ (C.R.S. § 18-5-114), ‘identity theft’ (C.R.S. § 18-5-902), “honest service fraud” (18 U.S.C. § 1346), mail fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1341), ‘conspiracy to defraud the government with respect to claims’ (18 U.S.C. § 286), ‘conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States’ (18 U.S.C. § 371), making or presenting ‘false, fictitious or fraudulent claims’ to the government (18 U.S.C. § 287), and state and federal treason (C.R.S. § 18-11-101 & 18 U.S.C. § 2381).

COUNTS 298-369

On July 17, 2017, unbeknownst to me, in conspiracy with the other CFCs and DAVIS and all knowing of their lack of jurisdiction and authority, CFC ALABISO, without giving me an opportunity to be heard on the matter, forged and secretly entered a known false judgment against my “strawman” in the amount of the INTERVENOR’s known false arrears balance; each therefore committing, in addition to the forgery (see Counts 121-153), state and federal conspiracies against my children’s and my rights (C.R.S. § 18-2-201 & 18 U.S.C. § 241), a class 6 felony issuance of a ‘false certificate’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-406), a class B federal felony creation of a ‘fictitious obligation’ (18 U.S.C. § 514), deprivation of my right to be heard on the matter (18 U.S.C. § 242), ‘first degree official misconduct’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-404), ‘offering a false instrument for recording’ (C.R.S. § 18-5-114), and became principals or accessories and/or aided in the INTERVENOR’s racketeering and other treasonous crimes against my family, including but not limited to: ‘identity theft’ (C.R.S. § 18-5-902), use of my name for over a decade in their racketeering and money laundering operation (C.R.S. §§ 18-17-101 to 18-17-109), ‘criminal attempt’ (C.R.S. § 18-2-101) to enslave me with another fictitious obligation and criminally extort more money from me (C.R.S. § 18-3-207), state and federal perjuries (C.R.S. § 18-8-502 & 18 U.S.C. § 1621), purposeful failure to serve process (C.R.S. § 18-8-404 & 18 U.S.C. § 242), and state and federal treason (C.R.S. § 18-11-101 & 18 U.S.C. § 2381).

COUNTS 370-374

In September 2017, CFC ZENISEK—knowing full well that he has no authority or jurisdiction in the case—entered an order setting a deadline for the filing of my PETITION FOR REVIEW; committing another count of ‘first degree official misconduct’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-404), another ‘offering a false instrument for recording’ (C.R.S. § 18-5-114), another “honest service fraud” (18 U.S.C. § 1346), and another act of state and federal treason (C.R.S. § 18-11-101 & 18 U.S.C. § 2381).

COUNTS 375-390

In October 2017, Jefferson County Domestic Relations Clerk MARJORY SHOOK—knowing full well from my filings that my children and I are crime victims and have been separated and cutoff from all communications with each other and suffering enormously for many years—conspired with other clerks and likely with CFC ZENISEK and/or the other CFCs (one co-conspirator counted), and purposely, willfully, and unlawfully took, carried away, concealed, and/or failed to file the first part of my petition for review and other important court documents until after CFC ZENISEK’s fake deadline, to cause dismissal of my appeal at the Colorado Court of Appeals (case 2017CA1600); committing state and federal conspiracies (C.R.S. § 18-2-201 and 18 U.S.C. § 241), the state crime(s) of ‘tampering with physical evidence’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-610) or ‘abuse of public records’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-411), the federal crimes of ‘concealment’ (18 U.S.C. § 2071(a)), ‘tampering with a victim’ (18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(1)), and ‘deprivation of rights under color of law’ (18 U.S.C. § 242), and ‘first degree official misconduct’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-404).

COUNTS 391-413

On November 21, 2017, Court of Appeals’ judges J. DUNN, J. NAVARRO, and J. HARRIS—despite knowing from my filings that CFC ZENISEK had no authority to set said deadline and therefore the deadline was void, that CFC MCNULTY was refusing to appoint a review judge as required by law and reassign the case to a “fair and impartial judge, and that the CFCs were again working together to “fix” the appeal against me—wrongly dismissed appeal 2017CA1600 with prejudice due to the fact that PART ONE of my PETITION FOR REVIEW was filed after CFC ZENISEK’s deadline; and even after learning about, and seeing evidence proving, SHOOK’s crimes, CFC MCNULTY’s crimes, and CFC ZENISEK’s crimes, in the attachments to my MOTION TO FORTHWITH SET ASIDE ORDER OF DISMISSAL AND TO REINSTATE APPEAL, the same judges wrongly denied my motion to reinstate, citing no reasons, but stating in their order, “Mandate remains due January 3, 2018,” [which I later found was an appeal fixing tactic by the clerk of the appellate courts POLLY BROCK, who I now know was involved in the appeal fixing] and, in addition, failed to report the crimes to the proper authorities; therefore the “appeal fixing criminals” (“AFCs”) named J. DUNN, J. NAVARRO, and J. HARRIS committed state and federal conspiracies (C.R.S. § 18-2-201 and 18 U.S.C. § 241), the state crime of failing their ‘duty to report a crime’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-115), the federal crime of ‘misprision of felony’ (18 U.S.C. § 4), ‘first degree official misconduct’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-404), ‘offering a false instrument for recording’ (C.R.S. § 18-5-114) and/or ‘abuse of public records’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-411), ‘deprivation of rights under color of law’ (18 U.S.C. § 242), and “honest service fraud” (18 U.S.C. § 1346). [And became principals or accessories and/or aided in the CFCs’ “case fixing crime spree.”]

COUNTS 414-498

On November 22, the day after the Court of Appeals dismissed my appeal, in conspiracy with the other CFCs (and likely with the AFCs and other criminals) and all knowing of their lack of jurisdiction and authority, in an order titled, “Order: re Intervenor’s Motion to Dismiss Respondent’s Petitions for Review, Parts One, Two and Three,” CFC ZENISEK—knowingly acting again without authority or jurisdiction—dismissed PARTs ONE, TWO, THREE, FOUR, FIVE, and SIX of my PETITION FOR REVIEW, as well as my First, Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Motions to Set Aside All Decisions in Case 2005DR212, without making any findings of fact or conclusions of law, without holding any hearings on the 12 separate and distinct issues, and without any adjudication whatsoever (which everyone knows automatically rendered his order void by operation of law even if he was a legitimate, ethical, fair and impartial judge with actual authority and jurisdiction over my strawman and the 12 separate and distinct subject matters at hand); each therefore committing another forgery, 12 more counts of ‘first degree official misconduct’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-404), 12 more counts of ‘deprivation of rights under color of law’ (18 U.S.C. § 242), another ‘offering a false instrument for recording’ (C.R.S. § 18-5-114), another “honest service fraud” (18 U.S.C. § 1346), and another act of state and federal treason (C.R.S. § 18-11-101 & 18 U.S.C. § 2381).

COUNTS 499-516

In January 2018, I submitted 12 separate NOTICES OF APPEAL according to the law to the Court of Appeals to open 12 separate appeals on the 12 separate matters dismissed by CFC ZENISEK, but Court of Appeals Clerk of Court POLLY BROCK—knowing full well from my previous filings that my children and I are victims of an ongoing “case fixing crime spree” in the First Judicial district and that I was accusing CFC SHOOK of several crimes—consolidated all 12 NOTICES OF APPEAL into one case (see appeal 2018CA45), refused to separate them as I requested, and then conspired with other AFCs (one co-conspirator counted) to make and file a fraudulent consolidation order in an attempt to cover up her crimes; and therefore AFC BROCK and at least one other conspirator committed state and federal conspiracies (C.R.S. § 18-2-201 and 18 U.S.C. § 241), ‘abuse of public records’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-411), falsification of records (18 U.S.C. § 2071(b) and/or 18 U.S.C. § 2073), ‘tampering with a victim’ (18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(1)), ‘deprivation of rights under color of law’ (18 U.S.C. § 242), ‘first degree official misconduct’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-404), failed her ‘duty to report a crime’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-115), ‘misprision of felony’ (18 U.S.C. § 4), and “honest service fraud” (18 U.S.C. § 1346). [And became a principal or accessory and/or aided in the CFCs’ “case fixing crime spree” and the AFCs’ “appeal fixing crime spree.”]

COUNTS 517-537

On January 16, 2018, I found out that CFC SHOOK and other Jefferson County clerks were being instructed by the CFJD Clerk of Court DIANA COFFEY to discriminate against me by refusing to provide information about my case and transferring my calls to her voicemail; later that day I discovered that CFC SHOOK and the other clerks were again purposely failing to file my court documents, apparently on the orders of CFC COFFEY—this time, although received on January 8, not one of my 12 NOTICES OF APPEAL nor my 12 Motions to Waive Filing Fees in appeal 2018CA45 had been filed when I called on January 16, and one of the Jefferson County clerks told me that they were waiting for AFC BROCK’s “mandate,” verifying that AFC BROCK was in on the conspiracy to “fix” this appeal against like they did in 2017CA1600; therefore CFC COFFEY, CFC SHOOK, AFC BROCK (and likely others in the CFJD and at the Court of Appeals), committed state and federal conspiracies (C.R.S. § 18-2-201 and 18 U.S.C. § 241), ‘first degree official misconduct’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-404), ‘criminal attempt’ (C.R.S. § 18-2-101) to cause further harm to my case, ‘concealment’ (18 U.S.C. § 2071(a)), ‘deprivation of rights under color of law’ (18 U.S.C. § 242), and “honest service fraud” (18 U.S.C. § 1346).

COUNTS 538-540

When I talked to CFC COFFEY on the phone on January 18, 2018, she confirmed that she had not only instructed CFC SHOOK and the other clerks to discriminate against me (see Counts 517-537), but had also failed to report CFC SHOOKS’ crimes or to take any action whatsoever to stop the “case fixing crime spree” against my family, in which her office is participating; and therefore CFC COFFEY also failed her ‘duty to report a crime’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-115) and committed ‘deprivation of rights under color of law’ (18 U.S.C. § 242) and ‘misprision of felony’ (18 U.S.C. § 4).

COUNTS 541-560

On February 12 & 14, 2018, I emailed CFC COFFEY requesting a full PDF copy of the Register of Actions in 2005DR212 and confirmation that the full record, including transcripts, were being prepared to be transmitted to the Court of Appeals, and sent follow up emails on February 19 & 22, to which CFC COFFEY finally responded to advise that CFC ZENISEK had entered another void order on the record denying my 5-½ month old motion to the “newly designated fair and impartial review judge” during appeal 2017CA1600 for an order requiring the CFCs to pay for transcripts and other costs of preparation of the record for the appeal; which therefore evidences that CFC COFFEY and CFC ZENISEK each committed state and federal conspiracies (C.R.S. § 18-2-201 and 18 U.S.C. § 241), another count of ‘first degree official misconduct’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-404), ‘criminal attempt’ (C.R.S. § 18-2-101) to cause further harm to my case, ‘offering a false instrument for recording’ (C.R.S. § 18-5-114), ‘abuse of public records’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-411), falsification of records (18 U.S.C. § 2071(b) and/or 18 U.S.C. § 2073), “honest service fraud” (18 U.S.C. § 1346), and state and federal treason (C.R.S. § 18-11-101 & 18 U.S.C. § 2381).

COUNTS 538-540

I then emailed CFJD District Administrator GAIL PICKARTS, explained the ongoing crime spree in which the Jefferson County and appellate clerks were participating, and requested that she take charge of the file in 2005DR212, investigate and take action to stop the crime spree, and ensure that the designated records, including transcripts, are transmitted to the Court of Appeals, but CFC PICKARTS, apparently in conspiracy with CFC COFFEY, CFC ZENISEK, and CFC MCNULTY, responded denying my requests, falsely accusing me of threatening her family, and evidencing that she is in full support of the continuing “case fixing crime spree,” racketeering and other treasonous crime taking place in her district, and will aid the CFCs in their cover up of their crimes in any way she can; and therefore each committed state and federal conspiracies (C.R.S. § 18-2-201 and 18 U.S.C. § 241), failed in their ‘duty to report a crime’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-115), ‘deprivation of rights under color of law’ (18 U.S.C. § 242), ‘misprision of felony’ (18 U.S.C. § 4) ‘first degree official misconduct’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-404), ‘criminal attempt’ (C.R.S. § 18-2-101) to cause further harm to my case, and “honest service fraud” (18 U.S.C. § 1346), and all CFJD CFCs became principals or accessories and/or are aiding in their offices’ ongoing ‘offering a false instrument for recording’ (C.R.S. § 18-5-114), ‘abuse of public records’ (C.R.S. § 18-8-411), falsification of records (18 U.S.C. § 2071(b) and/or 18 U.S.C. § 2073), state and federal perjuries (C.R.S. § 18-8-502 & 18 U.S.C. § 1621), purposeful failure to serve process and hold hearings (C.R.S. § 18-8-404 & 18 U.S.C. § 242), ‘identity theft’ (C.R.S. § 18-5-902), ‘criminal extortion’ (C.R.S. § 18-3-207), and other means of “fixing” appeal 2018CA45 against me, and became principals or accessories and/or are aiding in all other crimes being committed in the CFJD’s racketeering and money laundering operation (C.R.S. §§ 18-17-101 to 18-17-109) and state and federal treason (C.R.S. § 18-11-101 & 18 U.S.C. § 2381).


LIST OF CRIMES:

JANE, several Jeffco-CSS officials and their attorneys, the “case fixing criminals,” and others involved in the “child support scam” over the past decade, committed numerous state and federal crimes during their ‘color of law’ enforcement of a known void child support order and pursuit of my payment of undue child support, including but not limited to: (emphasis added)

COLORADO CRIMES:

C.R.S. § 26-1-127 Fraudulent acts

(1) Any person who obtains or any person who willfully aids or abets another to obtain public assistance or vendor payments or medical assistance as defined in this title to which the person is not entitled or in an amount greater than that to which the person is justly entitled or payment of any forfeited installment grants or benefits to which the person is not entitled or in a greater amount than that to which the person is entitled, by means of a willfully false statement or representation, or by impersonation, or by any other fraudulent device, commits the crime of theft, which crime shall be classified in accordance with section 18-4-401 (2), C.R.S., and which crime shall be punished as provided in section 18-1.3-401, C.R.S., if the crime is classified as a felony, or section 18-1.3-501, C.R.S., if the crime is classified as a misdemeanor. To the extent not otherwise prohibited by state or federal law, any person violating the provisions of this subsection (1) is disqualified from participation in any public assistance program under article 2 of this title for one year for a first offense, two years for a second offense, and permanently for a third or subsequent offense. Such disqualification is mandatory and is in addition to any other penalty imposed by law.

C.R.S. § 18-2-101 Criminal attempt

(1) A person commits criminal attempt if, acting with the kind of culpability otherwise required for commission of an offense, he engages in conduct constituting a substantial step toward the commission of the offense…

(2) A person who engages in conduct intending to aid another to commit an offense commits criminal attempt if the conduct would establish his complicity under section 18-1-603 were the offense committed by the other person, even if the other is not guilty of committing or attempting the offense …

C.R.S. § 18-2-201 Conspiracy

(1) A person commits conspiracy to commit a crime if, with the intent to promote or facilitate its commission, he agrees with another person or persons that they, or one or more of them, will engage in conduct which constitutes a crime or an attempt to commit a crime, or he agrees to aid the other person or persons in the planning or commission of a crime or of an attempt to commit such crime …

C.R.S. § 18-2-301 Criminal solicitation

(1) … a person is guilty of criminal solicitation if he or she commands, induces, entreats, or otherwise attempts to persuade another person, or offers his or her services or another’s services to a third person, to commit a felony, whether as principal or accomplice, with intent to promote or facilitate the commission of that crime, and under circumstances strongly corroborative of that intent …

C.R.S. § 18-3-207 Criminal extortion – aggravated extortion

(1) A person commits criminal extortion if:

(a) The person, without legal authority and with the intent to induce another person against that other person’s will to perform an act or to refrain from performing a lawful act, makes a substantial threat to confine or restrain, cause economic hardship or bodily injury to, or damage the property or reputation of, the threatened person or another person; …

C.R.S. § 18-3-303 False imprisonment

(1) Any person who knowingly confines or detains another without the other’s consent and without proper legal authority commits false imprisonment …

(2) False imprisonment is a class 2 misdemeanor; except that false imprisonment is a class 5 felony if: …

(a) The person confines or detains the other person for twelve hours or longer. …

C.R.S. § 18-3-304 Violation of custody order or order relating to parental responsibilities

(1) … any person, including a natural or foster parent, who … takes or entices any child under the age of eighteen years from the custody or care of the child’s parents, guardian, or other lawful custodian or person with parental responsibilities with respect to the child commits a class 5 felony.

(2) … any parent or other person who violates an order of any district or juvenile court of this state, granting the custody of a child or parental responsibilities with respect to a child under the age of eighteen years to any person, agency, or institution, with the intent to deprive the lawful custodian or person with parental responsibilities of the custody or care of a child under the age of eighteen years, commits a class 5 felony …

C.R.S. § 18-3-503 Coercion of involuntary servitude

(1) A person commits coercion of involuntary servitude if he or she coerces another person to perform labor or services by: …

(c) Threatening serious harm or physical restraint against that person or another person; …

(e) Abusing or threatening abuse of law or the legal process …

C.R.S. § 18-3-602 Stalking – penalty – definitions

(1) A person commits stalking if directly, or indirectly through another person, the person knowingly:

(a) Makes a credible threat to another person and, in connection with the threat, repeatedly follows, approaches, contacts, or places under surveillance that person …

(b) Makes a credible threat to another person and, in connection with the threat, repeatedly makes any form of communication with that person …

C.R.S. § 18-4-401 Theft

(1) A person commits theft when he knowingly obtains or exercises control over anything of value of another without authorization, or by threat or deception, and:

(a) Intends to deprive the other person permanently of the use or benefit of the thing of value; or

(b) Knowingly uses, conceals, or abandons the thing of value in such manner as to deprive the other person permanently of its use or benefit; or

(c) Uses, conceals, or abandons the thing of value intending that such use, concealment, or abandonment will deprive the other person permanently of its use and benefit; or

(d) Demands any consideration to which he is not legally entitled as a condition of restoring the thing of value to the other person. …

C.R.S. § 18-4-404 Obtaining control over any stolen thing of value

Every person who obtains control over any stolen thing of value, knowing the thing of value to have been stolen by another, may be tried, convicted, and punished whether or not the principal is charged, tried, or convicted.

C.R.S. § 18-4-409 Aggravated motor vehicle theft

(2) A person commits aggravated motor vehicle theft in the first degree if he or she knowingly obtains or exercises control over the motor vehicle of another without authorization or by threat or deception …

(a) Intends to deprive the other person permanently of the use or benefit of the thing of value; or

(b) Knowingly uses, conceals, or abandons the thing of value in such manner as to deprive the other person permanently of its use or benefit; or

(c) Uses, conceals, or abandons the thing of value intending that such use, concealment, or abandonment will deprive the other person permanently of its use and benefit; or

C.R.S. § 18-4-410 Theft by receiving

(1) … a person commits theft by receiving when he receives, retains, loans money by pawn or pledge on, or disposes of anything of value of another, knowing or believing that said thing of value has been stolen, and when he intends to deprive the lawful owner permanently of the use or benefit of the thing of value. …

C.R.S. § 18-4-501 Criminal mischief

(1) A person who knowingly damages the real or personal property of one or more other persons … [w]here the aggregate damage to the real or personal property is twenty thousand dollars or more, the person commits a class 3 felony.

C.R.S. § 18-4-502 First degree criminal trespass

A person commits the crime of first degree criminal trespass if such person knowingly and unlawfully enters or remains in a dwelling of another or if such person enters any motor vehicle with intent to commit a crime therein. First degree criminal trespass is a class 5 felony.

C.R.S. § 18-5-102 Forgery

(1) A person commits forgery, if, with intent to defraud, such person falsely makes, completes, alters, or utters a written instrument which is or purports to be, or which is calculated to become or to represent if completed:…

(c) A deed, will, codicil, contract, assignment, commercial instrument, promissory note, check, or other instrument which does or may evidence, create, transfer, terminate, or otherwise affect a legal right, interest, obligation, or status; or …

(d) A public record or an instrument filed or required by law to be filed or legally fileable in or with a public office or public servant; or

(e) A written instrument officially issued or created by a public office, public servant, or government agency; or …

(2) Forgery is a class 5 felony. …

C.R.S. § 18-5-105 Criminal possession of a forged instrument

A person commits a class 6 felony when, with knowledge that it is forged and with intent to use to defraud, such person possesses any forged instrument of a kind described in section 18-5-102.

C.R.S. § 18-5-114 Offering a false instrument for recording

(1) A person commits offering a false instrument for recording in the first degree if, knowing that a written instrument relating to or affecting real or personal property or directly affecting contractual relationships contains a material false statement or material false information, and with intent to defraud, he presents or offers it to a public office or a public employee, with the knowledge or belief that it will be registered, filed, or recorded or become a part of the records of that public office or public employee. …

C.R.S. § 18-5-209 Issuing a false financial statement – obtaining a financial transaction device by false statements

(1) A person commits issuing a false financial statement if, with intent to defraud, he:

(b) Represents in writing that a written instrument purporting to describe another person’s financial condition or ability to pay as of a prior date is accurate with respect to that person’s current financial condition or ability to pay, knowing the instrument to be materially false in that respect and reasonably relied upon.

C.R.S. § 18-5-902 Identity theft

(1) A person commits identity theft if he or she:

(a) Knowingly uses the personal identifying information, financial identifying information, or financial device of another without permission or lawful authority with the intent to obtain cash, credit, property, services, or any other thing of value or to make a financial payment;

(b) Knowingly possesses the personal identifying information, financial identifying information, or financial device of another without permission or lawful authority, with the intent to use or to aid or permit some other person to use such information or device to obtain cash, credit, property, services, or any other thing of value …

(c) With the intent to defraud, falsely makes, completes, alters, or utters a written instrument or financial device containing any personal identifying information or financial identifying information of another;

(d) Knowingly possesses the personal identifying information or financial identifying information of another without permission or lawful authority to use in applying for or completing an application for a financial device or other extension of credit;

(e) Knowingly uses or possesses the personal identifying information of another without permission or lawful authority with the intent to obtain a government-issued document; …

(2) Identity theft is a class 4 felony. …

C.R.S. § 18-5-904 Gathering identity information by deception

(1) A person commits gathering identity information by deception if he or she knowingly makes or conveys a materially false statement, without permission or lawful authority, with the intent to obtain, record, or access the personal identifying information or financial identifying information of another. …

C.R.S. § 18-5.5-102 Computer crime

(1) A person commits computer crime if the person knowingly:

(a) Accesses a computer, computer network, or computer system or any part thereof without authorization; exceeds authorized access to a computer, computer network, or computer system or any part thereof; or uses a computer, computer network, or computer system or any part thereof without authorization or in excess of authorized access; or

(b) Accesses any computer, computer network, or computer system, or any part thereof for the purpose of devising or executing any scheme or artifice to defraud; or

(c) Accesses any computer, computer network, or computer system, or any part thereof to obtain, by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, money; property; services; passwords or similar information through which a computer, computer network, or computer system or any part thereof may be accessed; or other thing of value; or

(d) Accesses any computer, computer network, or computer system, or any part thereof to commit theft; or

(e) Without authorization or in excess of authorized access alters, damages, interrupts, or causes the interruption or impairment of the proper functioning of, or causes any damage to, any computer, computer network, computer system, computer software, program, application, documentation, or data contained in such computer, computer network, or computer system or any part thereof; or …

C.R.S. § 18-6-401 Child abuse

(1) (a) A person commits child abuse if such person causes an injury to a child’s life or health, or permits a child to be unreasonably placed in a situation that poses a threat of injury to the child’s life or health, or engages in a continued pattern of conduct that results incruel punishment, mistreatment

C.R.S. § 18-6-701 Contributing to the delinquency of a minor

(1) Any person who induces, aids, or encourages a child to violate any federal or state law, municipal or county ordinance, or court order commits contributing to the delinquency of a minor. For the purposes of this section, the term “child” means any person under the age of eighteen years.

(2) Contributing to the delinquency of a minor is a class 4 felony.

C.R.S. § 18-6-800.3 Definitions

(1) “Domestic violence” means an act or threatened act of violence upon a person with whom the actor is or has been involved in an intimate relationship. “Domestic violence” also includes any other crime against a person, or against property, including an animal, or any municipal ordinance violation against a person, or against property, including an animal, when used as a method of coercion, control, punishment, intimidation, or revenge directed against a person with whom the actor is or has been involved in an intimate relationship.

C.R.S. § 18-8-105 Accessory to a crime

(1) A person is an accessory to crime if, with intent to hinder, delay, or prevent the discovery, detection, apprehension, prosecution, conviction, or punishment of another for the commission of a crime, he renders assistance to such person. …

C.R.S. § 18-8-108 Compounding

(1) A person commits compounding if he accepts or agrees to accept any pecuniary benefit as consideration for:

(a) Refraining from seeking prosecution of an offender;

(b) Refraining from reporting to law enforcement authorities the commission or suspected commission of any crime or information relating to a crime. …

C.R.S. § 18-8-111 False reporting to authorities

(1) A person commits false reporting to authorities, if

(b) He or she makes a report or knowingly causes the transmission of a report to law enforcement authorities of a crime or other incident within their official concern when he knows that it did not occur; or

(c) He or she makes a report or knowingly causes the transmission of a report to law enforcement authorities pretending to furnish information relating to an offense or other incident within their official concern when he or she knows … that the information is false; or …

(2) False reporting to authorities is a class 3 misdemeanor.

C.R.S. § 18-8-113 Impersonating a public servant

(1) A person commits impersonating a public servant if he falsely pretends to be a public servant other than a peace officer and performs any act in that pretended capacity. …

C.R.S. § 18-8-114 Abuse of public records

(1) A person commits a class 1 misdemeanor if:

(a) The person knowingly makes a false entry in or falsely alters any public record; or

(b) Knowing the person lacks the authority to do so, the person knowingly destroys, mutilates, conceals, removes, or impairs the availability of any public record; or

(c) Knowing the person lacks the authority to retain the record, the person refuses to deliver up a public record in the person’s possession upon proper request of any person lawfully entitled to receive such record; or …

(2) As used in this section, the term “public record” includes all official books, papers, or records created, received, or used by or in any governmental office or agency.

C.R.S. § 18-8-115 Duty to report a crime – liability for disclosure

It is the duty of every corporation or person who has reasonable grounds to believe that a crime has been committed to report promptly the suspected crime to law enforcement authorities. …

C.R.S. § 18-8-306 Attempt to influence a public servant

Any person who attempts to influence any public servant by means of deceit or by threat of violence or economic reprisal against any person or property, with the intent thereby to alter or affect the public servant’s decision, vote, opinion, or action concerning any matter which is to be considered or performed by him or the agency or body of which he is a member, commits a class 4 felony.

C.R.S. § 18-8-308 Failing to disclose a conflict of interest

(1) A public servant commits failing to disclose a conflict of interest if he exercises any substantial discretionary function in connection with a government contract, purchase, payment, or other pecuniary transaction without having given seventy-two hours’ actual advance written notice to the secretary of state and to the governing body of the government which employs the public servant of the existence of a known potential conflicting interest of the public servant in the transaction with reference to which he is about to act in his official capacity.

(2) A “potential conflicting interest” exists when the public servant is a director, president, general manager, or similar executive officer or owns or controls directly or indirectly a substantial interest in any nongovernmental entity participating in the transaction.

C.R.S. § 18-8-403 Official oppression

(1) A public servant, while acting or purporting to act in an official capacity or taking advantage of such actual or purported capacity, commits official oppression if, with actual knowledge that his conduct is illegal, he:

(a) Subjects another to arrest, detention, search, seizure, mistreatment, dispossession, assessment, or lien;…

C.R.S. § 18-8-404 First degree official misconduct

(1) A public servant commits first degree official misconduct if, with intent to obtain a benefit for the public servant or another or maliciously to cause harm to another, he or she knowingly:

(a) Commits an act relating to his office but constituting an unauthorized exercise of his official function; or

(b) Refrains from performing a duty imposed upon him by law; or

(c) Violates any statute or lawfully adopted rule or regulation relating to his office. …

C.R.S. § 18-8-406 Issuing a false certificate

A person commits a class 6 felony, if, being a public servant authorized by law to make and issue official certificates or other official written instruments, he makes and issues such an instrument containing a statement which he knows to be false.

C.R.S. § 18-8-502 Perjury in the first degree

(1) A person commits perjury in the first degree if in any official proceeding he knowingly makes a materially false statement, which he does not believe to be true, under an oath required or authorized by law. …

C.R.S. § 18-8-503 Perjury in the second degree

(1) A person commits perjury in the second degree if, other than in an official proceeding, with an intent to mislead a public servant in the performance of his duty, he makes a materially false statement, which he does not believe to be true, under an oath required or authorized by law.

C.R.S. § 18-8-610 Tampering with physical evidence

(1) A person commits tampering with physical evidence if, believing that an official proceeding is pending or about to be instituted and acting without legal right or authority, he:

(a) Destroys, mutilates, conceals, removes, or alters physical evidence with intent to impair its verity or availability in the pending or prospective official proceeding; or

(b) Knowingly makes, presents, or offers any false or altered physical evidence with intent that it be introduced in the pending or prospective official proceeding. …

(3) Tampering with physical evidence is a class 6 felony.

C.R.S. § 18-8-707 Tampering with a witness or victim

(1) A person commits tampering with a witness or victim if he intentionally attempts without bribery or threats to induce a witness or victim or a person he believes is to be called to testify as a witness or victim in any official proceeding or who may be called to testify as a witness to or victim of any crime to:

(a) Testify falsely or unlawfully withhold any testimony; …

(2) Tampering with a witness or victim is a class 4 felony.

C.R.S. § 18-11-101 Treason

(1) A person commits treason if he levies war against the state of Colorado or adheres to its enemies, giving them aid and comfort. …

(2) Treason is a class 1 felony.

C.R.S. §§ 18-17-101 to 18-17-109 Organized crime

Enterprisemeans any individual, sole proprietorship, partnership, corporation, trust, or other legal entity or any chartered union, association, or group of individuals, associated in fact although not a legal entity, and shall include illicit as well as licit enterprises and governmental as well as other entities

Racketeering activity” means to commit, to attempt to commit, to conspire to commit, or to solicit, coerce, or intimidate another person to commit: … Any conduct defined as “racketeering activity” under 18 U.S.C. 1961 (1) (A), (1) (B), (1) (C), and (1) (D); or …

Unlawful debtmeans a debt incurred or contracted in an illegal gambling activity or business or …

18-17-104. Prohibited activities … It is unlawful for any person, through a pattern of racketeering activity or through the collection of an unlawful debt, to knowingly acquire or maintain, directly or indirectly, any interest in or control of any enterprise or real property. … It is unlawful for any person employed by, or associated with, any enterprise to knowingly conduct or participate, directly or indirectly, in such enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity or the collection of an unlawful debt. …

FEDERAL CRIMES:

18 U.S.C. § 514 – Fictitious obligations

(a) Whoever, with the intent to defraud – (1) draws, prints, processes, produces, publishes, or otherwise makes, or attempts or causes the same, within the United States; (2) passes, utters, presents, offers, brokers, issues, sells, or attempts or causes the same, or with like intent possesses, within the United States; or (3) utilizes interstate or foreign commerce, including use of the mails or wire, radio, or other electronic communication, to transmit, transport, ship, move, transfer, or attempts or causes the same, to, from, or through the United States, any false or fictitious instrument, document, or other item appearing, representing, purporting, or contriving through scheme or artifice, to be an actual security or other financial instrument issued under the authority of the United States, a foreign government, a State or other political subdivision of the United States, or an organization, shall be guilty of a class B felony.

18 U.S.C. § 2 – Principals

(a) Whoever commits an offense against the United States or aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures its commission, is punishable as a principal.

(b) Whoever willfully causes an act to be done which if directly performed by him or another would be an offense against the United States, is punishable as a principal.

18 U.S.C. § 3 – Accessory after the fact

Whoever, knowing that an offense against the United States has been committed, receives, relieves, comforts or assists the offender in order to hinder or prevent his apprehension, trial or punishment, is an accessory after the fact. …

18 U.S.C. § 4 – Misprision of felony

Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

18 U.S.C. § 241 – Conspiracy against rights

If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; …

They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; …

18 U.S.C. § 242 – Deprivation of rights under color of law

Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State … to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States … shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; …

18 U.S.C. § 286 – Conspiracy to defraud the Government with respect to claims

Whoever enters into any agreement, combination, or conspiracy to defraud the United States, or any department or agency thereof, by obtaining or aiding to obtain the payment or allowance of any false, fictitious or fraudulent claim, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

18 U.S.C. § 287 – False, fictitious or fraudulent claims

Whoever makes or presents to any person or officer in the civil, military, or naval service of the United States, or to any department or agency thereof, any claim upon or against the United States, or any department or agency thereof, knowing such claim to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent, shall be imprisoned not more than five years and shall be subject to a fine in the amount provided in this title.

18 U.S.C. § 371 – Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States

If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. …

18 U.S.C. § 403 – Protection of the privacy of child victims and child witnesses

A knowing or intentional violation of the privacy protection accorded by section 3509 of this title is a criminal contempt punishable by not more than one year’s imprisonment, or a fine under this title, or both.

18 U.S.C. § 495 – Contracts, deeds, and powers of attorney

Whoever falsely makes, alters, forges, or counterfeits any … order, certificate, receipt, contract, or other writing, for the purpose of obtaining or receiving, or of enabling any other person, either directly or indirectly, to obtain or receive from the United States or any officers or agents thereof, any sum of money; or

Whoever utters or publishes as true any such false, forged, altered, or counterfeited writing, with intent to defraud the United States, knowing the same to be false, altered, forged, or counterfeited; or

Whoever transmits to, or presents at any office or officer of the United States, any such writing in support of, or in relation to, any account or claim, with intent to defraud the United States, knowing the same to be false, altered, forged, or counterfeited—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

18 U.S.C. § 666 – Theft or bribery concerning programs receiving Federal funds

(a) Whoever, if the circumstance described in subsection (b) of this section exists—

(1) being an agent of an organization, or of a State, local, or Indian tribal government, or any agency thereof—

(A) embezzles, steals, obtains by fraud, or otherwise without authority knowingly converts to the use of any person other than the rightful owner or intentionally misapplies, property that—

(i) is valued at $5,000 or more, and

(ii) is owned by, or is under the care, custody, or control of such organization, government, or agency; or

(B) corruptly solicits or demands for the benefit of any person, or accepts or agrees to accept, anything of value from any person, intending to be influenced or rewarded in connection with any business, transaction, or series of transactions of such organization, government, or agency involving any thing of value of $5,000 or more; or

(2) corruptly gives, offers, or agrees to give anything of value to any person, with intent to influence or reward an agent of an organization or of a State, local or Indian tribal government, or any agency thereof, in connection with any business, transaction, or series of transactions of such organization, government, or agency …

shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both.

(b) The circumstance referred to in subsection (a) of this section is that the organization, government, or agency receives, in any one year period, benefits in excess of $10,000 under a Federal program involving a grant, contract, subsidy, loan, guarantee, insurance, or other form of Federal assistance. …

18 U.S.C. § 1001 – Statements or entries generally

(a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully—

(1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact;

(2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or

(3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry;

shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or … both. …

18 U.S.C. § 1002 – Possession of false papers to defraud United States

Whoever, knowingly and with intent to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof, possesses any false, altered, forged, or counterfeited writing or document for the purpose of enabling another to obtain from the United States, or from any agency, officer or agent thereof, any sum of money, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

18 U.S.C. § 1018 – Official certificates and writings

Whoever, being a public officer or other person authorized by any law of the United States to make or give a certificate or other writing, knowingly makes and delivers as true such a certificate or writing, containing any statement which he knows to be false, in a case where the punishment thereof is not elsewhere expressly provided by law, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

18 U.S.C. § 1341 – Frauds and swindles

Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises … for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice or attempting so to do, places in any post office or authorized depository for mail matter, any matter or thing whatever to be sent or delivered by the Postal Service … shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both. …

18 U.S.C. § 1343 – Fraud by wire, radio, or television

Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, transmits or causes to be transmitted by means of wire … any writings, signs, signals, pictures, or sounds for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both. …

18 U.S.C. § 1344 – Bank fraud

Whoever knowingly executes, or attempts to execute, a scheme or artifice—

(1) to defraud a financial institution; or

(2) to obtain any of the moneys, funds, credits, assets, securities, or other property owned by, or under the custody or control of, a financial institution, by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises;

shall be fined not more than $1,000,000 or imprisoned not more than 30 years, or both.

18 U.S.C. § 1346 – Definition of “scheme or artifice to defraud” [“Honest Services Fraud”]

For the purposes of this chapter, the term “scheme or artifice to defraud” includes a scheme or artifice to deprive another of the intangible right of honest services.

18 U.S.C. § 1349 – Attempt and conspiracy

Any person who attempts or conspires to commit any offense under this chapter shall be subject to the same penalties as those prescribed for the offense, the commission of which was the object of the attempt or conspiracy.

18 U.S.C. § 1505 – Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies and committees

Whoever corruptly … influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States …

Shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years … or both …

18 USC § 1512 – Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant

(c) Whoever corruptly—

(1) alters, destroys, mutilates, or conceals a record, document, or other object, or attempts to do so, with the intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding; or

(2) otherwise obstructs, influences, or impedes any official proceeding, or attempts to do so,

shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both. …

18 USC § 1581 – Peonage; obstructing enforcement

(a) Whoever holds or returns any person to a condition of peonage … shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both. …

18 U.S.C. § 1621 – Perjury generally

Whoever—

(1) having taken an oath before a competent tribunal, officer, or person, in any case in which a law of the United States authorizes an oath to be administered, that he will testify, declare, depose, or certify truly, or that any written testimony, declaration, deposition, or certificate by him subscribed, is true, willfully and contrary to such oath states or subscribes any material matter which he does not believe to be true; or

(2) in any declaration, certificate, verification, or statement under penalty of perjury as permitted under section 1746 of title 28, United States Code, willfully subscribes as true any material matter which he does not believe to be true;

is guilty of perjury and shall, except as otherwise expressly provided by law, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. This section is applicable whether the statement or subscription is made within or without the United States.

18 U.S.C. § 1622 – Subornation of perjury

Whoever procures another to commit any perjury is guilty of subornation of perjury, and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

18 USC § 1701 – Obstruction of mails generally

Whoever knowingly and willfully obstructs or retards the passage of the mail, or any carrier or conveyance carrying the mail, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than six months, or both.

18 USC § 2073 – False entries and reports of moneys or securities

Whoever, being an officer, clerk, agent, or other employee of the United States or any of its agencies, charged with the duty of keeping accounts or records of any kind, with intent to deceive, mislead, injure, or defraud, makes in any such account or record any false or fictitious entry or record of any matter relating to or connected with his duties; …

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

18 U.S.C. § 2381 – Treason

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

18 U.S.C. § 2382 – Misprision of treason

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.

Whenever a judge [or any other government official] acts where he/she does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge [or other government official] is engaged in an act or acts of treason. U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S.Ct. 471, 66 L.Ed.2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L.Ed 257 (1821) Any judge, attorney, agent, or other official, who does not report an act of treason as required by law are themselves guilty of misprision of treason, 18 U.S.C. § 2382.

18 U.S.C. §§ 1951 to 1960 CHAPTER 95—Racketeering

18 U.S.C. §§ 1961 to 1968 CHAPTER 96—Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations

The term “extortion” means the obtaining of property from another, with his consent, induced by wrongful use of actual or threatened force, violence, or fear, or under color of official right. …

18 USC § 1955Laundering of monetary instrumentsWhoever, knowing that the property involved in a financial transaction represents the proceeds of some form of unlawful activity, conducts or attempts to conduct such a financial transaction which in fact involves the proceeds of specified unlawful activity … knowing that the transaction is designed in whole or in part … to conceal or disguise the nature … of specified unlawful activity; or … to avoid a transaction reporting requirement under State or Federal law, shall be sentenced to a fine of not more than $500,000 or twice the value of the property involved in the transaction, whichever is greater, or imprisonment for not more than twenty years, or both.

18 USC § 1962 – Prohibited activitiesIt shall be unlawful for any person employed by or associated with any enterprise engaged in, or the activities of which affect, interstate or foreign commerce, to conduct or participate, directly or indirectly, in the conduct of such enterprise’s affairs through a pattern of racketeering activity or collection of unlawful debt. …

18 USC § 880 – Receiving the proceeds of extortion

A person who receives, possesses, conceals, or disposes of any money or other property which was obtained from the commission of any offense under this chapter … knowing the same to have been unlawfully obtained, shall be imprisoned not more than 3 years, fined under this title, or both.


MINNESOTA CRIMES:

609.05 LIABILITY FOR CRIMES OF ANOTHER.

Subdivision 1. Aiding, abetting; liability.

A person is criminally liable for a crime committed by another if the person intentionally aids, advises, hires, counsels, or conspires with or otherwise procures the other to commit the crime …

609.17 ATTEMPTS.

Subdivision 1. Crime defined.

Whoever, with intent to commit a crime, does an act which is a substantial step toward, and more than preparation for, the commission of the crime is guilty of an attempt to commit that crime …

609.175 CONSPIRACY.

Subdivision 1. To cause arrest or prosecution.

Whoever conspires with another to cause a third person to be arrested or prosecuted on a criminal charge knowing the charge to be false …

Subd. 2. To commit crime.

Whoever conspires with another to commit a crime and in furtherance of the conspiracy one or more of the parties does some overt act in furtherance of such conspiracy …

This section applies if: … (1) the defendant in this state conspires with another outside of this state; or (2) the defendant outside of this state conspires with another in this state; or (3) the defendant outside of this state conspires with another outside of this state and an overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy is committed within this state by either of them; (4) the defendant in this state conspires with another in this state.

609.27 COERCION.

Subdivision 1. Acts constituting.

Whoever orally or in writing makes any of the following threats and thereby causes another against the other’s will to do any act or forbear doing a lawful act is guilty of coercion … (1) a threat to unlawfully inflict bodily harm upon, or hold in confinement, the person threatened or another … (2) a threat to unlawfully inflict damage to the property of the person threatened or another; or (3) a threat to unlawfully injure a trade, business, profession, or calling; or (4) a threat to expose a secret or deformity, publish a defamatory statement, or otherwise to expose any person to disgrace or ridicule; or (5) a threat to make or cause to be made a criminal charge, whether true or false …

609.43 MISCONDUCT OF PUBLIC OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE.

A public officer or employee who does any of the following, for which no other sentence is specifically provided by law, may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than one year or to payment of a fine of not more than $3,000, or both:

(1) intentionally fails or refuses to perform a known mandatory, nondiscretionary, ministerial duty of the office or employment within the time or in the manner required by law; or

(2) in the capacity of such officer or employee, does an act knowing it is in excess of lawful authority or knowing it is forbidden by law to be done in that capacity; or

(3) under pretense or color of official authority intentionally and unlawfully injures another in the other’s person, property, or rights; or

(4) in the capacity of such officer or employee, makes a return, certificate, official report, or other like document having knowledge it is false in any material respect.

609.48 PERJURY.

Subdivision 1. Acts constituting.

Whoever makes a false material statement not believing it to be true in any of the following cases is guilty of perjury… (1) in or for an action, hearing or proceeding of any kind in which the statement is required or authorized by law to be made under oath or affirmation; (2) in any writing which is required or authorized by law to be under oath or affirmation; …

609.52 THEFT.

Subd. 2. Acts constituting theft.

(a) Whoever does any of the following commits theft … (4) by swindling, whether by artifice, trick, device, or any other means, obtains property or services from another person …

609.7475 FRAUDULENT OR OTHERWISE IMPROPER FINANCING STATEMENTS.

Subd. 2. Crime described.

A person who: (1) knowingly causes to be presented for filing or promotes the filing of a record that … (ii) contains a forged signature or is based upon a document containing a forged signature; or (2) presents for filing or causes to be presented for filing a record with the intent that it be used to harass or defraud any other person …

609.749 STALKING; PENALTIES.

Subd. 2. Stalking crimes.

A person who stalks another by committing any of the following acts is guilty of a gross misdemeanor: (1) directly or indirectly, or through third parties, manifests a purpose or intent to injure the person, property, or rights of another by the commission of an unlawful act …

Subd. 3. Aggravated violations.

(a) A person who commits any of the following acts is guilty of a felony and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than five years or to payment of a fine of not more than $10,000, or both: (1) commits any offense described in subdivision 2 because of the victim’s … sex …

Subd. 5. Pattern of stalking conduct.

(a) A person who engages in a pattern of stalking conduct with respect to a single victim … which the actor knows or has reason to know would cause the victim under the circumstances to feel terrorized or to fear bodily harm and which does cause this reaction on the part of the victim, is guilty of a felony and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than ten years or to payment of a fine of not more than $20,000, or both …

609.765 CRIMINAL DEFAMATION.

Subdivision 1. Definition.

Defamatory matter is anything which exposes a person … to hatred, contempt, ridicule, degradation or disgrace in society, or injury to business or occupation.

Subd. 2. Acts constituting.

Whoever with knowledge of its false and defamatory character orally, in writing or by any other means, communicates any false and defamatory matter to a third person without the consent of the person defamed is guilty of criminal defamation …

609.903 RACKETEERING.

Subdivision 1. Crime.

A person is guilty of racketeering if the person: (1) is employed by or associated with an enterprise and intentionally conducts or participates in the affairs of the enterprise by participating in a pattern of criminal activity …